Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. However, since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations, we cannot permit inoculations against cow flu to be routinely administered.
Inoculations against cow flu was found to be effective in majority of the cases. But there is a small possibility of death as a result of the inoculation. It is a valid reason to hold off the permit for inoculations against cow flu to be routinely administered. However, it cannot be the case for the long run.
In the moral point of view, we cannot neglect the loss of even one life. So, the decision to halt the permit had been given. But if the situation remains same, we won't be able to save the lives of people infected by cow flu. The need to find out the cause for death due to inoculation is an imminent and priority issue. The argument can be justified in the moral point of view and in the present situation.
If the outbreak of cow flu escalates, it will result in loss of many more lives compared to the lives lost due to the administration of the vaccine. So, in that scenario, it would be beneficial to give priority to the logical way and for the greater good, the inoculations against cow flu should be routinely administered to the people in areas where the disease is detected.
The strength of the argument varies with the outbreak of the cow flu. If the outbreak of the cow flu cannot be controlled, then the inoculations against cow flu should be permitted. It can save lives of many people but also comes with a small possibility of death. It is the only logical solution in the need of the situation.
Comments
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 2 2
No. of Sentences: 15 15
No. of Words: 264 350
No. of Characters: 1137 1500
No. of Different Words: 117 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.031 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.307 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.595 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 65 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 51 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 38 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 22 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 17.6 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.246 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.533 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.354 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.553 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.087 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, then, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.6327345309 81% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.9520958084 85% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 11.1786427146 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 13.6137724551 15% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 28.8173652695 31% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 55.5748502994 81% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 16.3942115768 55% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1170.0 2260.96107784 52% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 263.0 441.139720559 60% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.44866920152 5.12650576532 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.56307096286 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67879829943 2.78398813304 96% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 204.123752495 57% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.444866920152 0.468620217663 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 378.9 705.55239521 54% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59920159681 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.96107784431 161% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.76447105788 57% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 19.7664670659 76% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 22.8473053892 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.0541777557 57.8364921388 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.0 119.503703932 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5333333333 23.324526521 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.70786347227 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.25449101796 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.20758483034 61% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 6.88822355289 116% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.445861709373 0.218282227539 204% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139614523382 0.0743258471296 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0943190389638 0.0701772020484 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.286070345172 0.128457276422 223% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0657073301651 0.0628817314937 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.3 14.3799401198 58% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 48.3550499002 147% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 12.197005988 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.23 12.5979740519 65% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.12 8.32208582834 86% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 98.500998004 45% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 12.3882235529 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.1389221557 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.