Over time, the costs of processing go down because as organizations learn how to do things better, they become
more efficient. In color film processing, for example, the cost of a 3-by-5-inch print fell from 50 cents for five-day
service in 1970 to 20 cents for one-day service in 1984. The same principle applies to the processing of food. And
since Olympic Foods will soon celebrate its 25th birthday, we can expect that our long experience will enable us to
minimize costs and thus maximize profits.
The argument is stating that over time, the costs of processing of for an organization goes down as it learns how to do things better and its efficiency increases with time. Argument is based upon the example of color film processing industry where costs of processing decreased with time. It is stated that Olympic Foods will be able soon minimize its costs and hence maximize its profits as it was with color film processing.
There are various factors that decides the overall costs of processing, argument should take into consideration all the factors before coming to a strong conclusion and predicting whether the costs of processing will go down with time or whether it will remain same or whether it will increase. As it is stated that in case of color fill processing there was huge decrease in total processing costs for the 3-by-5 print from 1970 to 1984. This could have been because of innovation, which resulted in reducing overall processing costs and not because of experience gained during this time. In 1970, may be 90% of the total processing cost was because of labor charges and now in 1984 because of new technology total labor requirement is reduced by 90%, hence reducing the total cost of processing. There may be other factors those have resulted in reducing total processing cost. New technology may have resulted in reducing total wastage during the processing, hence resulting in reducing the total processing cost. It is stated that for Olympics foods, because of their long experience, they will be able to minimize costs
and this maximize profits. This may not happen, may be by their 25th birthday, cost of labor is increased by tremendous amount and also other cost like that of machinery required for processing will be increased, raw material cost is increased, electricity charges are increased. All these factors will lead to increase in total costs, hence reduced profits.
There may be other factors that effects to overall profits like increase in market competition which will force Olympic Food to reduce its selling price, affecting its overall profits. Olympic food may be able to reduce its total costs of processing but market competition and some natural calamity may affect its overall profit. By 25th birthday, Olympic food may run some promotion campaign in-order to attract more customers or in-order to retain existing customers, affecting its bottom line and its profits. Therefore, multitude of factors ranging from increase in labor cost, increased electricity charges, increased cost of raw material, increase in shop rent etc. can affect total profits of Olympic foods. Hence it can be concluded based upon the analysis and various reasons stated above that reduction in processing cost does not guarantee increased profits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1125, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nce, they will be able to minimize costs and this maximize profits. This may not ...
^^^
Line 6, column 716, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... affect total profits of Olympic foods. Hence it can be concluded based upon the anal...
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'hence', 'may', 'so', 'therefore']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.271255060729 0.25644967241 106% => OK
Verbs: 0.182186234818 0.15541462614 117% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0789473684211 0.0836205057962 94% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0242914979757 0.0520304965353 47% => Some adverbs wanted.
Pronouns: 0.0404858299595 0.0272364105082 149% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.145748987854 0.125424944231 116% => OK
Participles: 0.0769230769231 0.0416121511921 185% => Less participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.59726656906 2.79052419416 93% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0202429149798 0.026700313972 76% => OK
Particles: 0.00202429149798 0.001811407834 112% => OK
Determiners: 0.0485829959514 0.113004496875 43% => Some determiners wanted.
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0425101214575 0.0255425247493 166% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0121457489879 0.0127820249294 95% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2791.0 2731.13054187 102% => OK
No of words: 454.0 446.07635468 102% => OK
Chars per words: 6.14757709251 6.12365571057 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61598047577 4.57801047555 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.370044052863 0.378187486979 98% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.306167400881 0.287650121315 106% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.20704845815 0.208842608468 99% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.127753303965 0.135150697306 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59726656906 2.79052419416 93% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 207.018472906 91% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.416299559471 0.469332199767 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 45.7033258107 52.1807786196 88% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 20.039408867 90% => OK
Sentence length: 25.2222222222 23.2022227129 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.9348292864 57.7814097925 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.055555556 141.986410481 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2222222222 23.2022227129 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.333333333333 0.724660767414 46% => More Discourse Markers wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.14285714286 78% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.58251231527 56% => OK
Readability: 55.8389623103 51.9672348444 107% => OK
Elegance: 2.0 1.8405768891 109% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.391004050457 0.441005458295 89% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.201781361712 0.135418324435 149% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.135160052516 0.0829849096947 163% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.521297041621 0.58762219726 89% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.154091149294 0.147661913831 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165160743264 0.193483328276 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0951228837253 0.0970749176394 98% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.398975569456 0.42659136922 94% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0319924126056 0.0774707102158 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.262155768902 0.312017818177 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100796246716 0.0698173142475 144% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.33743842365 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 6.87684729064 44% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.82512315271 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 12.0 6.46551724138 186% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 5.36822660099 37% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.82389162562 71% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 14.657635468 109% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.