The author manifests the reasoning because of which he reflects that supercorp has taken a sagacious decision to shift from Middlesurg to Corporateville. Although, at first glance, his reasoning seems probable and feasible, the author fails to answer further questions that should be analyzed before hastily coming to the conclusion. The author shows no statistical and empirical evidence for all his assumptions and reasoning and therefore should be evaluated.
The author naively assumes that Corporateville is a better place to live as compared to Middlesburg. He bases his assumption on the thought that since a number of owners are inflating in Corporatesville it is a better place to live. In order to make a discerning decision, he should have considered other salient features that carries a more important role in the accretion of the population in Corporatesville. It is viable to ruminate about the possibilities of employability options that could be increased in that area because of which people are immigrating here or there could be better educational facilities which are causing this inflation of population. Therefore, the author should first go through these divergent possibilities leading to increasing in population instead of assuming that the living style is good.
Also, the argument is fallacious because the author makes an assumption for all the employee of supercorp that they prefer to live in the non-urban area. He bases his assumption with the results of the survey but does not provide any statistical data to compare the number of people who are in the support and who are not in the support of living in the non-urban area. He also does not give any type of information about the type of questions that were asked to the employees during the survey. It is possible that the survey takers have just asked them about which type of place you like more for a living. They could have just answered nonurban by the ruminating about the tranquility of that area. They would have not thought about the lack of educational and medical facilities or any other logical terms that those nonurban areas contain or not.
Finally, the argument is based on tenuous reasoning as the author recommends Corporateville over Middlesburg because they possess lower taxes and therefore, assumes that Corporateville is more economical to live. The author does not manifest any logical analysis of other factors like living standards of that place or educational and transportation facilities. Also, there is no information about the medical facilities and the present environment there. As more and more people are shifting there, it could be the case that in future pollution will increase. Though the cost of taxes is less, it is possible that the cost of living is higher in Corporatesville. As the place is becoming crowded with more and more people, the availability of residences is fulfilled or not. Also, the cost of rents could aggrandize because of the same reason stated above. In that case, low taxes will be of no importance then. The author should make a discriminating conclusion after going through these necessitate questions.
In conclusion, because of the aforementioned reasoning, it is clear that the argument is based on unwarranted reasoning and should be further evaluated. The author should provide empirical evidence for the cost of other facilities also to ensure that this place is cheaper. He should have insightful results of all the number and questions that the survey carries.
Essay evaluation report
argument 1 -- OK
argument 2 -- not OK. look:
the survey is about 'its workers prefer to live in an area that is not urban.', if the survey is about where is the working place, they may change the idea.
argument 3 -- OK
----------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 26 15
No. of Words: 571 350
No. of Characters: 2906 1500
No. of Different Words: 221 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.888 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.089 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.923 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 209 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 157 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 115 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 88 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.962 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.112 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.462 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.298 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.478 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.129 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, so, then, therefore, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 19.6327345309 158% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.9520958084 124% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 11.1786427146 170% => OK
Relative clauses : 27.0 13.6137724551 198% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 28.8173652695 167% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 80.0 55.5748502994 144% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 16.3942115768 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2966.0 2260.96107784 131% => OK
No of words: 571.0 441.139720559 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19439579685 5.12650576532 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.88831323574 4.56307096286 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98268584804 2.78398813304 107% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 204.123752495 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.411558669002 0.468620217663 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 958.5 705.55239521 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 4.96107784431 262% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 12.0 8.76447105788 137% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.22255489022 118% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 19.7664670659 132% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.8473053892 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0580329282 57.8364921388 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.076923077 119.503703932 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9615384615 23.324526521 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.70786347227 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.25449101796 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.20758483034 171% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.88822355289 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0905152027335 0.218282227539 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0299107990906 0.0743258471296 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0444442175372 0.0701772020484 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0530639943117 0.128457276422 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0222419716255 0.0628817314937 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.3799401198 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.3550499002 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.197005988 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.5979740519 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.32208582834 99% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 98.500998004 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 12.3882235529 93% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.1389221557 93% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.9071856287 109% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.