Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archaeologists discovered such a "Palean" basket in Lithos, an ancient village across the Brim River from Palea. The Brim River is very deep and broad, and so the ancient Paleans could have crossed it only by boat, and no Palean boats have been found. Thus it follows that the so-called Palean baskets were not uniquely Palean.
The argument put forward by the author, initially stating that wowen baskets were made only by the Palean people. Later proving evidence for the non palean baskets. This argument lacks the evidences to conclude that so-called Palean baskets were not uniquely Palean
As mentioned in the argument Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea. If the baskets are found only in the prehistoric village of Palea doesn’t mean that only Palean people have made this. Proper evidences are required about the people who are staying in the Plaean and their job details.
Archaeologists discovered such a "Palean" basket in Lithos, an ancient village across the Brim River from Palea. It doesn’t mean that baskets are not made by Palean people. There is also a possibility that Palean people might have travelled to Lithos and started making Woven baskets. Proper evidences are required about the Litos village people and their occupation.
The Brim River is very deep and broad. It might be because of the rainy season. Evidences are required about the seasons. Suppose if it not the rainy season then the river wouldn’t be braod, so that Palean people might have easily travelled by walking.
Boats might hane been destroyed as year passes or ther might be some extreme climate changes because of which boat might not appeared now. Evidences are required about when the survey is done. Without proper evidences it is impossible to conclude Plaean baskets were not uniquely Palean.
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts. 33
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could. 50
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed 50
- abc 16
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain. 33
Comments
Essay evaluation report
flaws:
No. of Words: 261 350
---------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 2.5 out of 6
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 16 15
No. of Words: 261 350
No. of Characters: 1300 1500
No. of Different Words: 129 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.019 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.981 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.419 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 101 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 67 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 38 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 24 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 16.312 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.956 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.188 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.373 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.373 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.084 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 32, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...etails. Archaeologists discovered such a 'Palean' basket in Lithos, an...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.6327345309 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.9520958084 46% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 11.1786427146 45% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 13.6137724551 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 28.8173652695 49% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 55.5748502994 45% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 16.3942115768 30% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1361.0 2260.96107784 60% => OK
No of words: 258.0 441.139720559 58% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27519379845 5.12650576532 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.56307096286 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67598257832 2.78398813304 96% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 204.123752495 62% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492248062016 0.468620217663 105% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 705.55239521 61% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 19.7664670659 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 22.8473053892 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 59.6762096652 57.8364921388 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.0625 119.503703932 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.125 23.324526521 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.125 5.70786347227 20% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.20758483034 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.67664670659 235% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.350020213264 0.218282227539 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108043744962 0.0743258471296 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.144997634963 0.0701772020484 207% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202340999427 0.128457276422 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.181202176448 0.0628817314937 288% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 14.3799401198 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 48.3550499002 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.197005988 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.5979740519 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.32208582834 98% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 98.500998004 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 12.3882235529 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.1389221557 75% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.