Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archaeologists discovered such a "Palean" basket in Lithos, an ancient village across the Brim River from Palea. The Brim River is very deep and broad, and so the ancient Paleans could have crossed it only by boat, and no Palean boats have been found. Thus it follows that the so-called Palean baskets were not uniquely Palean.
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
In this argument, the author concludes that xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. To justify his conclusion, the author states that xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
Nevertheless, this argument is specious on several grounds since the author has failed to provide sufficient evidence to substantiate his conclusion. First, the author needs to examine xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx to evaluate his assumption that xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
xxx
xxx
xxx
Consequently, we must reject the assertion that xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. Conversely, to strengthen his statement, the author has to prove that xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
Second, even if xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, more evidence revealing the xxxxxxx would help the author ascertain xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
xxx
xxx
xxx
As a result, the situation weakens the author’s claim that xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. In contrast, to bolster his assertion, the author has to guanartee xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
Third, granted that xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, additional evidence about other possibilities that xxxxxxxxxx gains great significance to xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
xxx
xxx
xxx
In these cases, it is unlikely that xxxxxxxxxxxx, which eventually reinforces his claim.
In sum, the evidence that the author quotes does not provide conclusive information about xxxxxxxxxxxxx. As a result, we demand additional information to better evaluate the author’s claim that xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Xxx
... assumption that xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. xxx xxx xxx Consequently, we must reject...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: xxx
... assumption that xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. xxx xxx xxx Consequently, we must reject the ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: xxx
...he author ascertain xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xxx xxx xxx As a result, the situation weaken...
^^^^^^^^
Line 16, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Xxx
...great significance to xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. xxx xxx xxx In these cases, it is unlike...
^^^
Line 16, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: xxx
...great significance to xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. xxx xxx xxx In these cases, it is unlikely th...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, conversely, first, if, nevertheless, second, then, third, as to, in contrast, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 19.6327345309 10% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 12.9520958084 15% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 11.1786427146 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 13.6137724551 88% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 28.8173652695 80% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 55.5748502994 34% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 14.0 16.3942115768 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1287.0 2260.96107784 57% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 177.0 441.139720559 40% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 7.27118644068 5.12650576532 142% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 4.56307096286 80% => OK
Word Length SD: 6.56718361759 2.78398813304 236% => Word_Length_SD is high.
Unique words: 102.0 204.123752495 50% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576271186441 0.468620217663 123% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 705.55239521 36% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59920159681 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.76447105788 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.22255489022 166% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 19.7664670659 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 14.0 22.8473053892 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.5842982339 57.8364921388 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.25 119.503703932 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.75 23.324526521 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.58333333333 5.70786347227 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 8.0 5.15768463074 155% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.20758483034 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 6.88822355289 44% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.218282227539 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0743258471296 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0701772020484 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.128457276422 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0628817314937 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.2 14.3799401198 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 48.3550499002 153% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 12.197005988 52% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 24.29 12.5979740519 193% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.32208582834 101% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 98.500998004 47% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 12.3882235529 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.1389221557 68% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.9071856287 59% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.