All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
As we human beings progess in this world, companies: a term invented for the modern age has been lurking more and more. If we look into our past, even before the start of the industriliazation age, there was no such thing called "company" existed. The prompts offers a view, which is , companies operational efficiency should be enhanced by recruiting a consultant to revise their policies. And gives a opinion that their own employees advices are much more effective, leaving outside consultancy redundant. I agree to this opinion for several reasons, but also acknowledge some shortcomings.
At first, any company, even if it is as big as tech giants Apple and Google, hiring outside consultants takes up a substantial amount of money. If we circumsribe our companies to be startups or small campanies which started recently, this expenditure will be marked as too prodigal for them. This may even cut down their revenues by a huge remarkable amount. As a whole, for this range of companies, consultancy is a poor choice of strategy which will be invasive for the companies. If we look into the big companies which have more profits and revenues that they can afford such consultancy without having to worry about money, there is no hundred percent surity that advices will prove effective to their respective companies. There may even be a possibility that suggestions lead them into huge amount of loss. In general, the amount of money associated with the consultancy and probability of these suggestions working out for a company are not making a better company. The ideas and intimations from the respective employees should be more important and utilized as a great resource to make the company a better one.
Furthermore, consultancy not only takes up a huge amount of money, but also occupies a great space of time. Time , which is too much of valuable for any company, should not be wasted into mere good ideas of a consultant. It is better to have surveys and questionnaiers within the employees. The surveys will help the company evaluate more about the needs of the employees and how should the internal infrastructre of a company should be modified to increase the operational efficiency. There may even be minor changes which will help the company such as, in a certain company, there is no coffee machine inside the company which leads considerable wastage of time for employees who prefers coffee over other beverages. This employees may go outside to a coffee shop, which leads to certain amount of time go to waste. This small time intervals accumulates to a huge chunk of wasted time that can easily be eradicated by installing a coffee machine.
However, some companies do need consultancy to make some authoritative decisions about the company's future decisions. As employees are not fit to delve their suggestions about the future, outside help may be needed. As the consultants are expert about these kind of advises, they may be able help the company more than the employees in this field.
In conclusion, even though there are some limitations of consultancy's help about the company.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 271, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'offer'.
Suggestion: offer
...apos;company' existed. The prompts offers a view, which is , companies operationa...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 294, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ted. The prompts offers a view, which is , companies operational efficiency should...
^^
Line 1, column 412, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ant to revise their policies. And gives a opinion that their own employees advice...
^
Line 5, column 113, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...lso occupies a great space of time. Time , which is too much of valuable for any c...
^^
Line 7, column 196, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ir suggestions about the future, outside help may be needed. As the consultants a...
^^
Line 7, column 254, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...ed. As the consultants are expert about these kind of advises, they may be able help the c...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, look, may, so, as to, in conclusion, in general, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 12.9106741573 8% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2612.0 2235.4752809 117% => OK
No of words: 518.0 442.535393258 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04247104247 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77070365392 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9161253372 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 215.323595506 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.465250965251 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 839.7 704.065955056 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.10617977528 290% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9368035744 60.3974514979 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.833333333 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5833333333 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.54166666667 5.21951772744 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.40355137156 0.243740707755 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121382217271 0.0831039109588 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0691981150602 0.0758088955206 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239129300686 0.150359130593 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0925281269267 0.0667264976115 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 100.480337079 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 271, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'offer'.
Suggestion: offer
...apos;company' existed. The prompts offers a view, which is , companies operationa...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 294, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ted. The prompts offers a view, which is , companies operational efficiency should...
^^
Line 1, column 412, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ant to revise their policies. And gives a opinion that their own employees advice...
^
Line 5, column 113, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...lso occupies a great space of time. Time , which is too much of valuable for any c...
^^
Line 7, column 196, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ir suggestions about the future, outside help may be needed. As the consultants a...
^^
Line 7, column 254, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...ed. As the consultants are expert about these kind of advises, they may be able help the c...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, look, may, so, as to, in conclusion, in general, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 12.9106741573 8% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2612.0 2235.4752809 117% => OK
No of words: 518.0 442.535393258 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04247104247 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77070365392 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9161253372 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 215.323595506 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.465250965251 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 839.7 704.065955056 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.10617977528 290% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9368035744 60.3974514979 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.833333333 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5833333333 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.54166666667 5.21951772744 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.40355137156 0.243740707755 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121382217271 0.0831039109588 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0691981150602 0.0758088955206 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239129300686 0.150359130593 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0925281269267 0.0667264976115 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 100.480337079 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.