Claim: Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today.
Reason: We are not able to make connections between current events and past events until we have some distance from both.
At this age of modern era, numerous socio-economic ideologies and morals are rapidly morphing into new ones. As the claim in the prompt is about the past events are not beneficial with respect to the current phenomenons, as there should be a distance between the present and the past, before incorporating them. I mostly disagree with this for some reasons, but acknowledge the claim in some cases.
To begin with, as individuals or as a society, only way to get ahead in our life/lives is to contemplating about the past. Ruminating about the mistakes that we made, and to learn from these very mistakes to avoid them in the future. Our past is our error-logs, our errors, our mistakes, our downfalls, and our failures. These rich resource should be used not only as an individual, but also as a society, as a country to reflect upon them, and be a better person, society , or even a country. As in the 19th century, we had two world wars in our world, which were destructive, left indelible marks in the face of Earth. Thousands of people were killed, thousands of people were tortured, society torn to pieces, and normal life of people were in havoc. And all these, for what ? Every country should be aware of the outcomes of these wars, as these kinds of actions should never be repeated. As allied forces nuclear bombed Japan at the end of war killing thousands and thousands of innocent people, still considered as the darkest day in human race.
Additionally, we should always look back into our pasts, and meticulously scrutinize our mistakes. As individual, one maybe was a slacker in his high-school days, but at present wants to have a stable career in life. So, at first he has to acknowledge his errors, mistakes, and the indifference to schools should be considered. He has to give up these actions, as it led him to a bad corner in his life. He has to cut the slacking, be more attentive to his surroundings and make the most out the opportunities that is available to him. That being said, there is not always an instant reflection about the past. In many cases, the distance between the present and the past is a must. For example, if this was considered for a tech company, there is has to be a minimum gap in the time-line for them to know about their mistakes, and make better decisions. As FaceBook is a corporate legend in social media industry, is being prosecuted for their clients privacy violations. It's a tech company, they do not have ready made solutions to tackle such claims and allegations. They have to go through their codings regarding such issues, and try to correct them.
In conclusion, it is best to say, past is the wonderful resource for anyone, assimilating the past for the present decisions has its pros and cons.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 473, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...on them, and be a better person, society , or even a country. As in the 19th centu...
^^
Line 5, column 974, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: It's; It is
...d for their clients privacy violations. Its a tech company, they do not have ready ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, may, regarding, so, still, as to, for example, in conclusion, in many cases, in some cases, to begin with, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 49.0 33.0505617978 148% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 79.0 58.6224719101 135% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2281.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 486.0 442.535393258 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69341563786 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69525374022 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7264904489 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 215.323595506 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514403292181 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 712.8 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 6.24550561798 240% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 12.0 3.10617977528 386% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 13.0 1.77640449438 732% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7336931299 60.3974514979 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0416666667 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.21951772744 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 5.13820224719 253% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189543437661 0.243740707755 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0512955898958 0.0831039109588 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589610699032 0.0758088955206 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124132175074 0.150359130593 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0423818858115 0.0667264976115 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 12.1639044944 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.