All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
The employees of a company are the most crucial asset considering its existence and growth. They are the ones to shape the future of the company by taking essential measures. The prompt suggets that there is no need to hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to work with more efficacy. In my opinion, I strongly agree with this suggestion and explain by stating two important reasons.
To begin, the employees of the company are responsible for its profits and losses. They have been with the company throughout its span and have a more profound knowledge about the working of the company and the services offered when juxtaposed with the outside consultants. If one hires outside consultants to improve their services, they have to first analyze the company's past and present works before they can jump to any conclusion and offer suggestions. They considerably takes a lot of time for them to meticulously study the operations of the company. In that case, if the company is already facing losses it cannot wait for such a long time to incorporate any suggestion. On the contrary, since the employees have appreciable information about the logistics of the company they are more suited to come up with a solution much better and faster than the outside consultants.
Secondly, if the company prioritizes suggestions of its own employees over outsiders, perhaps the employees will also want to stay loyal to the company. Moreover, if the company further raises salary or promotes its employees for every accurate suggestions offered, consider the fact that it will remarkably motivate and encourage its own employees. Who would deny receiving extra money for his or her service to its organization that would in return ameliorate the effectiveness of the organization?
Some critics might argue that the outside consultants are professionals and would provide a detailed analysis and suggestions than its own employees. However, if you think about the reasons mentioned, it would definitely stimulate their own employees to improve their skills and also get rewarded for that. Ultimately its the employees of the company who would shape the organizations future.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to have lots of different friends than it is to have just a few friends Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary 60
- Young people enjoy life more than older people do 80
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition 83
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 92
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 478, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'They' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'take'
Suggestion: take
...nd offer suggestions. They considerably takes a lot of time for them to meticulously ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 319, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
... also get rewarded for that. Ultimately its the employees of the company who would ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, in my opinion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1838.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 353.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20679886686 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88124683995 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526912181303 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 583.2 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5680447429 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.875 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0625 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.21951772744 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.404290910957 0.243740707755 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140183068933 0.0831039109588 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0678058774074 0.0758088955206 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252872089547 0.150359130593 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0482881962089 0.0667264976115 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.