All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
For a company to grow exponentially, there is a need for consistent updates and feedback implementation. Some organizations engage the services of a consultant while others use the comments from employees to effect the necessary changes for the company's growth. it has been argued that the use of consultants for this process would be totally unnecessary if employers listen to their staff. However, this logic is flawed for a number of reasons.Many might think that the opinions of employees are very valid as they are the ones who are often affected by a company's policies and cultures. While this might be true, it does not consider that the feedback of employees can often be biased and based on emotion rather than logic. Workers would always seek out policies and changes that benefit them first before thinking of its impact on the organization.It is also worthy to note that the use of a consultant provides an opportunity to have a critical look at the organizations structure without any emotional influence. With the engagement of a consultant, policies that are adveresly affecting the organization can be noted and solutions can be provided with expertise. With valid experience as a professional and an outsider, changes that are needed to effect reasonable changes that will ensure an organization's growth can be proferred wholesomely.Another reason why relying on the opinions of employyes cannnot be relied on is that employees can have differing opinions about issues. This will in turn cause discord in an organizations and the possibility of thoughts about favoritism. To avoid this, an outsider has to be sought to provide a diplomatic process of growth. No organization suceeds when they is disarray within it and as such avoid aproaches that can make employees feel sidelined or irrelevant.This is not to say that engaging the services of consultant is not without its own shortcomings. However, the pros far outweigh the cons. Also, employees can also be involved in a restructureing process as contributers but not as the lead. To conclude, listening to the concerns of employees is not invalid. In fact, it is very important. However, it is preferably that an expert id hired to understand these concerns and opinions and provide expert advice based on them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 263, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...essary changes for the companys growth. it has been argued that the use of consult...
^^
Line 1, column 446, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Many
...logic is flawed for a number of reasons.Many might think that the opinions of employ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 446, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun might seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much might', 'a good deal of might'.
Suggestion: Much might; A good deal of might
...logic is flawed for a number of reasons.Many might think that the opinions of employees ar...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 853, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
...nking of its impact on the organization.It is also worthy to note that the use of ...
^^
Line 1, column 1301, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'organizations'' or 'organization's'?
Suggestion: organizations'; organization's
... reasonable changes that will ensure an organizations growth can be proferred wholesomely.Ano...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 1351, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Another
...ons growth can be proferred wholesomely.Another reason why relying on the opinions of e...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 1711, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'be'
Suggestion: be
...owth. No organization suceeds when they is disarray within it and as such avoid ap...
^^
Line 1, column 1814, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
... employees feel sidelined or irrelevant.This is not to say that engaging the service...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, so, while, as to, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1912.0 2235.4752809 86% => OK
No of words: 373.0 442.535393258 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12600536193 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15424636036 2.79657885939 113% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.509383378016 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 607.5 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.4034151895 60.3974514979 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.5 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3125 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 5.21951772744 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.97078651685 20% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208539933401 0.243740707755 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0706996079081 0.0831039109588 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597373651804 0.0758088955206 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208539933401 0.150359130593 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667264976115 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 14.1392134831 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 100.480337079 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.