Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.
The best leader is the one who has to lead the group as well as well understood their peers. The role of a leader is very crucial and important in any organization. The statement recommends that a leader should maintain the respect of each of his or her colleagues is more important than sound judgment. In my opinion, I strongly disagree with the statement because of the following reasons.
To begin with, the leader in the role model of any organization, and people of that organization follow their leader's behavior. For instance, A leader of a political group who always follows anti-corruption and guides their follower to do the same. Suppose one of the members of their organization to do the corruption and everyone in that organization get to know about the corrupt member. Consequently, if the leader doesn't do the sound judgment, just to maintain the relationship with the corrupt member it will not only leave a bad impression on the other members but also crate a counterproductive environment within the organization. Also, other people of the organization started doing corruption if the leader doesn't take the corresponding action. Thus, it's the leader whom people follows and it's the leader's responsibility to maintain the ethics and principal of the organization. The above example illustrates that a leader should always follow the ethics and principles of the organization rather than maintaining a relationship with their peers.
Furthermore, any organization runs solely on its leader quality. The environment of the organization depends solely on the behavior and ethics of their leader. So, it's a leader's responsibility that every one of his organizations should be treated equally, otherwise it will create conflict between the people of the organization. For example, the first manager of the software development company finds the mistake of their peers while working on a very important project. However, the first manager doesn't take necessary action to prevent this such mistake in the future to maintain the relationship with their peers. While the second manager never ignores the mistake from their peers and always correct them to avoid such a mistake in the future. Consequently, it will create a conflict between the two individual groups, and most of the workers prefer to work with the first manager and avoid the second manager. of course this type of action will hinder the growth of an organization or company. The above example demonstrates that the leader should always focus on correcting the mistake of their peers for the growth of their organization and maintain the sound environments within the organization.
All things considering, we can say that for the better development of the organization and maintain the ethics and standard of the organization leader should always try to correct their peers rather than maintaining a good relationship with their peers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-30 | rahatumar9072 | 50 | view |
| 2024-03-30 | rahatumar9072 | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-30 | qwertyy | 54 | view |
| 2023-09-24 | Adelaida | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-18 | Mayuresh08 | 50 | view |
- Claim Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today Reason We are not able to make connections between current events and past events until we have some distance from both 50
- One year ago we introduced our first product Bargain Brand breakfast cereal Our very low prices quickly drew many customers away from the top selling cereal companies Although the companies producing the top brands have since tried to compete with us by l 69
- The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds 50
- Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader it is not as important as a leader s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers 50
- The well being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 58, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'as well'.
Suggestion: as well
...s the one who is able to lead the group as well as well understood their peers. The role of a l...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 170, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...cial and important in any organization. The statement recommends that a leader shou...
^^^
Line 3, column 419, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...upt member. Consequently, if the leader doesnt do the sound judgment, just to maintain...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 648, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...rted doing the corruption if the leader doesnt take the corresponding action. Thus, it...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 692, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...nt take the corresponding action. Thus, its the leader whom people follows and its ...
^^^
Line 3, column 731, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
... its the leader whom people follows and its the leaders responsibility to maintain ...
^^^
Line 5, column 480, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ant project. However, the first manager doesnt take necessay action to prevent this su...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 707, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ways correct them to avoid such mistake in future. Consequently, it will create the confl...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, thus, well, while, for instance, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 19.5258426966 31% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 28.0 12.9106741573 217% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2341.0 2235.4752809 105% => OK
No of words: 448.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22544642857 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60065326758 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94113346577 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 215.323595506 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.404017857143 0.4932671777 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 712.8 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8807044904 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.476190476 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 5.21951772744 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241605942437 0.243740707755 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0882323701247 0.0831039109588 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0818890702266 0.0758088955206 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167435564417 0.150359130593 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0766828056756 0.0667264976115 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 100.480337079 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.