Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader it is not as important as a leader s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree wi

Essay topics:

Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

The above prompt states that for one to become a great leader, the importance of the capacity to respect their subordinates and under links outweighs the ability to judgement calls morally. I staunchly agree with this statement and the reasons for which I will be discussing.

Firstly, a great leader has to be venerable, and that is possible only if he treats everyone around him or her with tantamount respect. There is a saying that was given by Mark Twain, which goes by, "treat everyone the way you want to be treated". For example, if a project manager of a reputed organization keeps belittling and demeaning his team members, then they are not going to listen or follow him. Rather they will be terrified of him, which will inturn affect the productivity of the employees, as they would not be able to communicate their ideas freely. This inturn will affect the productivity of employees and the company cannot be successful if its employees are not happy.

Secondly, moral judgement is also important but it is feckless if the leader does not how to treat his peers. For example, Mahatma Gandhi had great ideas and got India their freedom from the British, but he was great leader only because he treated everyone equitably and reverentially, no matter what their social status was, or where they originated from. Even when the British disparaged him for wearing Khadi clothes to a world conference, he dealt with it in calm and poised manner and not once did he vilify the British in public.

Lastly, to become a successful renowned leader, it is indispensable to know how to handle people and the situation morally in a predicament. Without having the quality of being unflappable, a person can never become a true leader. For example, Mark Zuckerberg who is the CEO of Facebook, WhatsApp, and Instagram today, wouldn't be who he is today if he never knew how to solve a quagmire and treat his colleagues with respect. Although, he had this great idea of social media, he never would have made it to this level if he did not treat everyone around him equitably.

In conclusion, a combination of good moral judgement and the quality of being able to treat everyone deferentially is what makes one a great successful leader. The ability to treat everyone reverentially is an indispensable quality of a true leader.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (2 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 417, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
... are not going to listen or follow him. Rather they will be terrified of him, which wi...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 320, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...acebook, WhatsApp, and Instagram today, wouldnt be who he is today if he never knew how...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, then, as to, for example, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 33.0505617978 127% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1948.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 399.0 442.535393258 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88220551378 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80637076329 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.50626566416 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 607.5 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2344183546 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.75 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9375 23.4991977007 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.21951772744 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153796303862 0.243740707755 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0623070736429 0.0831039109588 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0497476393953 0.0758088955206 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0984922018728 0.150359130593 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0326642454972 0.0667264976115 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 100.480337079 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.