Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
A leader is someone who helps a group he leads to achieve great heights and let the individuals in a group flourish independently. It is often said that a leader is not born he is made. Some of the great leaders over the time posessed some common qualities like punctuality, respect of the peers and the lteam, having a good sense pof moral judgement and also [respecting the competition. Now comparing these qualities to one another is not easy, deciding what quality helps someone become a better leader depends on the group he is leading. In case of deciding between sound moral judgement and respect for the peers, I believe they go hand in hand.
One example of a leader is Mahatma gandhi, he led India to gain independence with just his words and a theory that suggests Non Violence. mahatama Gandhi believed in the theory that respecting the peers and even his followers is important for any individual to gain the confidence where he can actually help the team and the agenda. Mahatma Gandhi's moral judgement however was also a charismatic characterstic of his personality.
The above example was about a man who made a whole nation follow him ,On the other hand if we talk about a much smaller scale leader like a leader in corporate ladder for example a manager he should also have a sense on how to mantain professional relationships with his peers whilst giving them respect that they deserve. According to a study in 2019, most of the corporate office leaders treat their staff as slaves and this reflects neither respect for the peers nor sound moral judgement. This 2019 stat clearly stated that unhappy employees and productivity in an office are inversely propotional. If the employees are respected by their leader and the leader has a sound moral judgement, more productive the team would be.
as in the latter scenario the employees are florished in an environment where they feel their opinions are valued and hence people can help make the days more productive.
In conclusion, I believe both sound moral judgement and respect to the peers are equally important and go hand in hand. If even one quality is missing then the leader cannot relate with his followers and finally due to disparate ideas the gap would increase and both will never see eye to eye in anything, that will be the recipe for disaster.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 187, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...d that a leader is not born he is made. Some of the great leaders over the time posessed so...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 360, Rule ID: EN_UNPAIRED_BRACKETS
Message: Unpaired symbol: ']' seems to be missing
...good sense pof moral judgement and also [respecting the competition. Now comparin...
^
Line 3, column 139, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Mahatama
...nd a theory that suggests Non Violence. mahatama Gandhi believed in the theory that resp...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 69, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...a man who made a whole nation follow him ,On the other hand if we talk about a muc...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: As
...nt, more productive the team would be. as in the latter scenario the employees ar...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, finally, hence, however, if, so, then, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1938.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 403.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80893300248 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63755021193 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51364764268 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 612.9 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.0805927807 60.3974514979 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.2 118.986275619 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8666666667 23.4991977007 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.21951772744 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209574622407 0.243740707755 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0787479560954 0.0831039109588 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0404446008164 0.0758088955206 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112024937236 0.150359130593 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0441887772687 0.0667264976115 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.1392134831 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.8420337079 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 100.480337079 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.