It is a psychological aspect that we, as a human get interested in something by watching others pursue it. Their achievements motivates us to impeccably reach to the apogee of expertise in that domain. Each and every field in this contemporary world has it’s own set of achievers. Those personalities should have worked sedulously to make significant contribution for that particular field. However, inventions and discoveries makes us to think the way around. It is also true that each and every domain has it’s own heroes who thought out of box without getting influence by others to make inventory contributions being helpful for growth of that field. Hence, I partially agree that for any individual who wants to pursue something better than most, in his particular domain of interests, he must have the knowledge of how deeply that domain is being explored by the former adroit personalities.
In some cases, getting influenced by other’s works may not be necessary to achieve significantly in a particular domain. Take poets for example; to render the unique ideas, poets tend to exploit nature and it’s analogical aspects with life. Many poets put forth the ideas without getting influenced by any other writers. They come up with their own colors and flavors to contribute to the field of literature. Similarly, some of inventions too took place in the history by scientists who took the inspiration from the nature itself. For an instance, wright brothers, builders of the very first airplane took their inspiration from birds and the aerodynamic effect that birds go through to get that lift to move in the air. Such contributions to the particular field was came without any inspiration from human aspects in that domain.
However, most of the personalities in this world who are known for some inventions or great achievements are being influenced by their masters’ works. Right from the school age where one learns about the scientists or the philosophers who gave the probic works that is being set as an example for how deep we can dig the domain gives us the knowledge of how far we can go through that field. For example, Nikola Tesla was followed and adhered by Thomas Edison who was inventor of the bulb. The techniques and methodologies used by the so called dexterous scientist Nikola Tesla was being properly executed by edison adding his own methods and convoluting the former steps to certain amount to give world the light during the darkness.
Moreover, the advancement in the technology has gone too far such that there is very few or very infinitesimal number of domains which are being exploited by the man till date. For example, to publish a research paper, we have to validate the work by taking the conditions on which others might have worked in different ways over the same problem. If there is some work which has been reached far more than what we have, then our work tends to be useless. Each and every work will be evaluated by seeing how fruit full the solution given is for the problem existing in that domain. Hence, one must get influenced by former achievers to dig through their field of interests.
In a nutshell, It is mostly agreeable from given substantiation that to achieve something in some field, we must get influenced by the former achievers in that particular domain.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 909, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...red by the former adroit personalities. In some cases, getting influenced by oth...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 432, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'some of', you should use 'the' ('some of the inventions') or simply say ''some inventions''.
Suggestion: some of the inventions; some inventions
... to the field of literature. Similarly, some of inventions too took place in the history by scient...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 781, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'come'.
Suggestion: come
...ntributions to the particular field was came without any inspiration from human aspe...
^^^^
Line 5, column 741, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ve world the light during the darkness. Moreover, the advancement in the technol...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, may, moreover, similarly, so, then, for example, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 26.0 11.3162921348 230% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 47.0 33.0505617978 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 86.0 58.6224719101 147% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2799.0 2235.4752809 125% => OK
No of words: 562.0 442.535393258 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98042704626 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.86893614481 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80178604925 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 269.0 215.323595506 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.478647686833 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 864.0 704.065955056 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.837654266 60.3974514979 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.625 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4166666667 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.16666666667 5.21951772744 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183978197627 0.243740707755 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0612164904971 0.0831039109588 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0461958136515 0.0758088955206 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114033761389 0.150359130593 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0333830535695 0.0667264976115 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 100.480337079 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.