In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.
The subject of whether a beginner is more likely to contribute than an expert is quite debatable. Budding beginners may be enthusiastic about learning new things in a particular field and may display a steep learning curve while experts being already knowledgeable in the field may have a more plateau learning curve. But does faster learning translate to capabilities of making better contributions to the field? I don’t think so.
In their embryonic stages, beginners are highly motivated to acquire knowledge so that they feel capable of finishing the project at hand. Right out of college, everyone is excited to begin their career. They are eager to see what their future beholds. College students are vivacious and full of aspirations. They are filled with hope of getting better every day at what they do and maybe someday they could become the CEO of a big company. With this hope, they may show exemplary learning skills in the beginning, grasping everything they see in one go. But once they imbibe all the knowledge required, they are not beginners anymore. Consequently, there will not be any difference between beginners and experts. At this point, beginners and experts are likely to contribute equally to the project or field.
Speaking of hope, college students having never experienced corporate atmosphere or real work before, may assume it is all the same. But a few months down the line, after gradually learning things about their work and the kind of problems they are expected to solve in their work, they may soon realize that it is not the same as college. It will soon hit them that they are to face real life problems to solve. Once that epiphany hits, doesn’t matter amateur or expert, they will
Admittedly, beginners do show a lot of creativity in the way they approach a problem. However, creativity does not work all the time. Experts would have been in the same place as them before. They have experienced it all. The excitement, hope and every emotion that a beginner feels. These experiences in fact would have taught them some invaluable lessons along the way. So it is naturally incumbent on experts to guide the beginners accordingly(throughout the essay I assumed that beginners and experts are working together on the same project). When beginners make a contribution to the project, it essentially means the same contribution constitutes some percentage of the experts as well. It is in fact the expert’s guidance that has led the beginner in making that meaning contribution.
In conclusion, it does not matter who exactly contributes to the project or the field. Whether there is a good collaboration between the beginners and experts is all that matters. Both beginner’s advanced learning skills and expert’s insightful experiences are critical to take a project to a completion. And both should to go hand in hand to achieve success.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 312, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to curve'
Suggestion: to curve
... field may have a more plateau learning curve. But does faster learning translate to ...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 344, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to translate'
Suggestion: to translate
...earning curve. But does faster learning translate to capabilities of making better contri...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, consequently, however, if, may, so, thus, well, while, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, speaking of, all the same
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 33.0505617978 136% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2435.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 479.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08350730689 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67825486995 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92879929896 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 215.323595506 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492693110647 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 759.6 704.065955056 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.2370786517 143% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.6992761814 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.9655172414 118.986275619 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5172413793 23.4991977007 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.51724137931 5.21951772744 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.83258426966 228% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227347102356 0.243740707755 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0660743723215 0.0831039109588 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0788225341523 0.0758088955206 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134939548715 0.150359130593 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0806032680271 0.0667264976115 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.