The people are voracious for getting new things, new ideas, new attempt, and new tests. Newly developed things and ideas are always in the center of attraction and the center of discussion. People feel bored having the same thing all the time. The canny people understand this fact and present something new or different than the existing one and got a public attraction. So, I strongly support the argument that the leading voices come from the people who are motivated by the desire to present opinion and ideas that differ from those held by the majority.
In any sector, the leading voice will be that which are different than the majority. I would like to present here some examples. The Apple company present smartphone while the majority of phone company were launching an ancient model phone. Even the product of Apple was very expensive, people were attracted to have enjoyed with the latest technology. And finally, Apple became the leading company. The Lord Buddha is praised by all because of his unique philosophy about religion. Likewise, Mahatma Gandhi, the freedom fighter of India, had presented the theory of peaceful revolution when India was colonized by the British. The rest of the contemporary leader and people were so angry with English and wants to do great war to cast away to them from India. However, Gandhi's perspective of the peace revolution got public attraction and became a leading idea. Finally, his innovative idea of revolution swept out the English colony from India. Still, his theory of peaceful revolution is popular in the name of Gandhigiri.
In the sector of science and technology, among the various invention, the Nanotechnology got lots of public attraction and became leading technology. If we see the politics of any country, the politicians who present a new roadmap of development are getting a majority from the election. We can feel that in television add of any product wants to show their product is different than others. Why? It is because the business people know that if they can present there product as different than the existing one, it will be the leading product.
It does not mean that the idea led by conviction can be ignored completely. Some altruistic work will be praised equally and can be a leading voice even many people depict that idea. For instance, the democratic movement of any country was found the common goal of majority people. Even, that courage of democratic movement came from a conviction of majority people, the voice of movement was found a leading voice.
Making a long story short, the leading voice in any sector is the one which arises from the willingness to present ideas unique than the majority. Sometimes even the idea arises from the conviction of the majority people can be a leading voice; especially in the field of altruistic work.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 322, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
... and present something new or different than the existing one and got a public attra...
^^^^
Line 3, column 67, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
... voice will be that which are different than the majority. I would like to present h...
^^^^
Line 5, column 380, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
...ants to show their product is different than others. Why? It is because the business...
^^^^
Line 5, column 489, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
... can present there product as different than the existing one, it will be the leadin...
^^^^
Line 5, column 489, Rule ID: AS_ADJ_AS[1]
Message: Comparison is written "as different 'as'".
Suggestion: as
... can present there product as different than the existing one, it will be the leadin...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, likewise, so, still, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2372.0 2235.4752809 106% => OK
No of words: 477.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97274633124 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67336384929 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57761566375 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.465408805031 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 761.4 704.065955056 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 12.0 4.99550561798 240% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.5357202955 60.3974514979 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.2307692308 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3461538462 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.38461538462 5.21951772744 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.415974247419 0.243740707755 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106126719118 0.0831039109588 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136305761172 0.0758088955206 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238767252543 0.150359130593 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.089485075363 0.0667264976115 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.