To be an effective leader, a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The author of the statement points out that a successful leader must follow the highest ethical and moral standards. While, in general, I concur with such an assertion, as leaders who maintain high ethical standards can be the role models of their people. However, a relentless pursuing of the highest moral behaviours may also lead to undesired results.
Admittedly, political leaders’ moral standards do have a crucial impact on their political career. For example, Donald Trump, the Republican nominee of 2016 president election of the United States, are now facing an overwhelming criticises about his previous insult of women. Many people even claim that whether they should let their children to see the news about Donald Trump, who has a very low standard of his moral behaviours, because they are afraid of their children being wrongly guided by Trump’s saying and behaviour. Thus, it is important for government officials to maintain high standards of their behaviours, because people, especially the young generations, tend to micmic their leaders’ words and behaviours. If the leaders’ behaviours are criticised severely, they may even not have the chance to wield their power to develop the society.
However, every coin has two sides. If people emphasise too much on the proper behaviours of political leaders, it may have an opposite effect on the society. The main obligations of a government and its officials should be economic prosperity, cultural flourish and the high living standards of people. If the public set too much regulations on their leaders, they are more likely to behave what the public want instead of scientifically planning for the long term development of the society. Moreover, it is almost impossible that public officials always behave properly, as they are also common people to some extent.
In my point of view, our society should figure out a more comprehensive evaluation system for public officials. Such a system need to add moral behaviours, economic development and ordinary people's living standards into consideration. To achieve the standards listed above, officials will maintain a balance between their daily behaviours and the economic and cultural tasks which are more important to ordinary people. In this way, the pursuit of high moral standards is based on the development of the society instead of condescending it.
In sum, requiring public leaders to maintain the highest moral standards is totally unnecessary, instead, officials should behave properly in front of the public, but more importantly, their main focus should be the prosperity of the country.
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree 83
- Volunteer work organised by middle schools brings more benefits than problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Fifteen years ago, Omega University implemented a new procedure that encouraged students to evaluate the teaching effectiveness of all their professors. Since that time, Omega professors have begun to assign higher grades in their classes, and overall stu 66
- The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and s 58
- The following appeared in a memo from the new vice president of Sartorian, a company that manufactures men's clothing."Five years ago, at a time when we had difficulties in obtaining reliable supplies of high quality wool fabric, we discontinued productio 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 219, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...on of the United States, are now facing an overwhelming criticises about his previous insult of...
Line 5, column 326, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
...ndards of people. If the public set too much regulations on their leaders, they are ...
Line 9, column 192, Rule ID: MAIN_FOCUS
Message: Use simply 'focus'.
...the public, but more importantly, their main focus should be the prosperity of the country...
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'so', 'thus', 'while', 'for example', 'in general']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.242105263158 0.240241500013 101% => OK
Verbs: 0.111578947368 0.157235817809 71% => OK
Adjectives: 0.117894736842 0.0880659088768 134% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0652631578947 0.0497285424764 131% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0526315789474 0.0444667217837 118% => OK
Prepositions: 0.111578947368 0.12292977631 91% => OK
Participles: 0.0231578947368 0.0406280797675 57% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.90257470279 2.79330140395 104% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0252631578947 0.030933414821 82% => OK
Particles: 0.00421052631579 0.0016655270985 253% => OK
Determiners: 0.0905263157895 0.0997080785238 91% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0231578947368 0.0249443105267 93% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00842105263158 0.0148568991511 57% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2646.0 2732.02544248 97% => OK
No of words: 414.0 452.878318584 91% => OK
Chars per words: 6.39130434783 6.0361032391 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.58838876751 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.444444444444 0.366273622748 121% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.321256038647 0.280924506359 114% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.243961352657 0.200843997647 121% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.164251207729 0.132149295362 124% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90257470279 2.79330140395 104% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 219.290929204 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509661835749 0.48968727796 104% => OK
Word variations: 56.8330513368 55.4138127331 103% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6194690265 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.380412469 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5813009527 59.4972553346 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.0 141.124799967 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 23.380412469 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.611111111111 0.674092028746 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.21349557522 58% => OK
Readability: 55.1256038647 51.4728631049 107% => OK
Elegance: 1.64220183486 1.64882698954 100% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.354587373284 0.391690518653 91% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.113501914899 0.123202303941 92% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0898293370982 0.077325440228 116% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.538031649634 0.547984918172 98% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.183785551535 0.149214159877 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150062502555 0.161403998019 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0854441318836 0.0892212321368 96% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.430823912078 0.385218514788 112% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.042205434162 0.0692045440612 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.273108276801 0.275328986314 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.054131373962 0.0653680567796 83% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.4325221239 77% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.30420353982 57% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88274336283 143% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 7.22455752212 111% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 2.70907079646 185% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 13.5995575221 110% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.