‘Because people increasingly eat at restaurants, all restaurants should be required to display nutritional information about the meals they serve. This knowledge makes it easier for diners to make healthy choices and reduces the risk of diet-related health problems.’
Nutritional information could be very useful before choosing a meal in a restaurant, this is because there are people who have chronic illnesses like diabetes, heart disease, etc. Not forgetting children who are better to be kept away from foods that are high in fat and calories. So having detailed knowledge about the meal’s nutrition before ordering may decrease the risk of getting sick or becoming obese for those who like to remain fit will be a brilliant idea.
As a New York Times stated in one of their blogs, 67% of people who live in the USA became obese because of fast food and high-calorie meals. Imagine if those restaurants create a menu that states how many calories each food is contained, maybe half of the above percentage would not eat that food, or they may eat a small amount of it. A better consequence would be choosing that food which is reached in vegetables and so on.
Sometimes we tend to listen to our desire, without paying attention to our health state. people with chronic illnesses like to eat delicious meals too, but the danger here is more than young and healthy classes. assuming the same amount of fats or calories in the food, it may affect twice a person who has heart disease than a person who does not have any heart issue.
Some may argue that this requirement might be costly and it might lower the restaurants’ income. At first, it might take a long process and requires a large amount of money even a disaster for the restaurants’ owner. But in the long term, it will possibly be a wise decision, because this strategy would be applied to all restaurants not just a couple of them. So, no one would take advantage of other restaurants’ new requirements of nutrition information about the food. It may increase their income too because people will have more trust in the restaurants’ food and may their rate increase more than the New York times estimation.
People would be more aware of their food and so healthier, that is why having food with the information about its content would be a brilliant idea, and this will directly reduce diseases like heart strokes and obesity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 89, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...t paying attention to our health state. people with chronic illnesses like to eat deli...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 212, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Assuming
...is more than young and healthy classes. assuming the same amount of fats or calories in ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
...es not have any heart issue. Some may argue that this requirement might be costly a...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1768.0 2235.4752809 79% => OK
No of words: 374.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72727272727 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59084148629 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524064171123 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 704.065955056 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8494946294 60.3974514979 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.866666667 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9333333333 23.4991977007 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.53333333333 5.21951772744 29% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250172224033 0.243740707755 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0896035455438 0.0831039109588 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.051721417834 0.0758088955206 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134660396656 0.150359130593 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0699215096438 0.0667264976115 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 100.480337079 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.