The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer-generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
A major attribute to environmental problems is the imprudent human actions. These actions primarily forestalled the environmental growth and focuses only on transient outcomes without considering undesirable consequences. One of the major factor that accounts for the environmental degradation is consumer-generated wastes. Generally consumer-generated wastes are the materials of an end products that cannot be used for production of another product. Though it seem valid to impose limits on the amount of trashes, it is less practical.
Instead of incorporating laws to control the consumer-generated wastes, the wisest method to control the problem is to hunt for other ideas to make the nest use of these wastes. For example, hydrocarbons are the substances that can be used to produce electricity and these hydrocarbons can be produced with the consumer-generated wastes. Sweden which understood the most likely result of producing these hydrocarbons, started to import wastes from other countries to produce electricity. Even the America implemented this technique to produce electricity for 7 lakhs households in its country. Moreover, it substantially increases the economic growth of a country with respect to electricity production.
In addition, despite of expelling the wastes, the organic wastes extracted from the whole can be composted as organic manure for the cultivation lands. Since it does not involve strenuous efforts, the composition can be carried out on quotidian basis and thus eventually ending up in mass reduction of trashes being produced by towns and cities. However, people should be aware of the whole composition process to employ it. So educating and empowering society with the mechanisms and steps involved in composition is necessary.
On the other hand, the materials of polystyrene form cannot be recycled say, plastics. With the plastic usage being increased and recycling these materials being impossible, it holds an adverse effect on environment. By limiting the use of polystyrene form materials and its production can be a viable solution. For example, the most popular form of plastic is carry bags and the reduction in usage of plastic bags can be compensated with paper bags or in other forms that are invulnerable to the environment.
Although imposing limits on the number of trashes that can result in reduction of problems but the degree to which it is reduced would be comparatively less than other available and proven techniques. Also, it leads to the dissatisfaction and hostile relationship between people and the government. It is the duty of the government to analyse the implications painstakingly before implementing any strict rules.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 463, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'seems'?
Suggestion: seems
...roduction of another product. Though it seem valid to impose limits on the amount of...
^^^^
Line 9, column 162, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...reduced would be comparatively less than other available and proven techniques. A...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, moreover, so, thus, as to, for example, in addition, with respect to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2295.0 2235.4752809 103% => OK
No of words: 414.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54347826087 5.05705443957 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3425562039 2.79657885939 120% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51690821256 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 729.9 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.319379515 60.3974514979 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.285714286 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7142857143 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.09523809524 5.21951772744 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1515033343 0.243740707755 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0465684132838 0.0831039109588 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0386920039588 0.0758088955206 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0897736601269 0.150359130593 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0458833616552 0.0667264976115 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 48.8420337079 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.1639044944 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 100.480337079 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.