Teaching is a two way process between the teacher and the student. The prompt states that the best way a person can be taught is by praising his or her positive actions while ignoring the negative ones. I mostly agree, that prasing someone for his positive actions can be fruitful for two reasons, but I do concede that sometimes ignoring the negative actions can backfire us.
Firstly, one should praise students strong points because doing so encourages the students to dive deep in the concepts which is getting the student praised. For instance, suppose a student is lauded by his teacher regarding his mathematical skills, the student will be encouraged to learn more about Mathematics and may even get inspired to become a Mathematician in future. The above example shows us that plausing students for their merits can be a good approach in teaching.
Secondly, another reason to adapt this teaching way is that it helps the teacher in identifying the interest of students. To illustrate, if a teacher praised a student for his performance in a speech giving competition which was mandatory for every student to participate and if the student shows willingness to participate in other cultural and extra curricular competition it may help the teacher to identify his or her interest and guide him accordingly in his educational years. From the above scenario it is lucid that prasing positive actions can be helpful for teachers.
Lastly, while the above method can be productive it does have some drawbacks because if we neglect negative actions of a individual he or she may do the same actions in future. For example, suppose a criminal is caught for an attempt to bribe a police officer and he or she is bailed out without any actions or criminal case, then the criminal may try to attempt again in the future and has learned nothing from his past. Hence to teach a person, his or her negative actions should not be ignored and the person should be notified for his or her negative acitions.
In conclusion, the prompt proposed way of teaching is productive for most of the times but that are certain times when it may be counterproductive. Hence the method should be modified where praising for positive actions and notifying for negative actions both should be performed side by side.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 365, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
... get inspired to become a Mathematician in future. The above example shows us that plausi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 120, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...cause if we neglect negative actions of a individual he or she may do the same ac...
^
Line 4, column 167, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...idual he or she may do the same actions in future. For example, suppose a criminal is cau...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 422, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... and has learned nothing from his past. Hence to teach a person, his or her negative ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 148, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...times when it may be counterproductive. Hence the method should be modified where pra...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, first, firstly, hence, if, lastly, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 58.6224719101 67% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1913.0 2235.4752809 86% => OK
No of words: 390.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90512820513 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73408490172 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 215.323595506 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.482051282051 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 607.5 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.736107744 60.3974514979 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.642857143 118.986275619 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8571428571 23.4991977007 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2857142857 5.21951772744 197% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279345696161 0.243740707755 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117809110987 0.0831039109588 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102620706761 0.0758088955206 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18001762978 0.150359130593 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124945653393 0.0667264976115 187% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 100.480337079 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.