The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
The statement contends that best way to teach is to praise positive actions. Moreover, ignoring negative actions is also leads to teach. First, before write on this issue we must know what is teaching. Teaching is an encourage someone to accept something as a fact or principle, In other words, cause to learn by example or experience. I concede that praise positive actions is really a best approach to teach, however, ignore negative action is not a good thing. Therefore, I agree with this statement at some extent.
As any human tendency, if someone praise a good for their action, in result, that human more encouraged to do their work or task with strong determination. For example, if any student do their assignments or home works very carefully, then, teacher praise him/her for their good works, consequently that student more enthusiasm for their task. In addition to that, other classmates also encouraged. Consequently, this method gives better result comparing past.
Although, the author assert that ignoring bad actions also leads to teach. I strongly disagree with this statement. For instance, if someone do harmful act and everyone neglect that act. This experience may be cause another harmful act. Hence, we need to communicate with that person regarding on previous act rather than neglect that act. Again on political issue, some political leaders do bad acts like bribery, corruption, so, it is a media job to enlighten that act. Subsequently, other political leaders bear in mind that their negative actions could be give bad result for current position.
In Conclusion, in any field politics, education, enterprise compliment for their good works encourage him/her. In addition, enlighten bad things also give better result.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 215, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...must know what is teaching. Teaching is an encourage someone to accept something as a fact o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 386, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
... that praise positive actions is really a best approach to teach, however, ignore...
^
Line 3, column 35, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'praises'.
Suggestion: praises
...t. As any human tendency, if someone praise a good for their action, in result, tha...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... gives better result comparing past. Although, the author assert that ignoring bad ac...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 143, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'does'.
Suggestion: does
...his statement. For instance, if someone do harmful act and everyone neglect that a...
^^
Line 5, column 209, Rule ID: BE_CAUSE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'because'?
Suggestion: because
...e neglect that act. This experience may be cause another harmful act. Hence, we need to ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, hence, however, if, may, moreover, really, regarding, so, then, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 58.6224719101 51% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1481.0 2235.4752809 66% => OK
No of words: 281.0 442.535393258 63% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27046263345 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72220360595 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 215.323595506 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576512455516 0.4932671777 117% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 704.065955056 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 23.0359550562 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.6590444395 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.9473684211 118.986275619 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.7894736842 23.4991977007 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.31578947368 5.21951772744 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24960427658 0.243740707755 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0905034982787 0.0831039109588 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.156048060445 0.0758088955206 206% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153398842409 0.150359130593 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.192770245405 0.0667264976115 289% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 48.8420337079 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 12.1743820225 72% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.69 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 100.480337079 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.2143820225 68% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.