The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take.
Does praising positive actions and ignoring negatives ones really the best way to teach? However, the author claims that the best way to teach is to praise the positive and ignore the negatives one. Praising positive actions actually encourage the learner and build up his or her morale but ignoring negative actions makes the learner feels he or she is doing the right thing.
Praising positive actions trigger a child to put in more efforts, for example, when an elementary school student is been awarded gift by his or her parents for coming first in His or Her class, this help the student not to relent and, also to work harder, just because he or she was appreciated for having good grades.
On the contrary, if parents ignores the negative acts of a child; like stealing and fighting, despite the fact that the child is sound academically, the bad act can tarnish the image of such child. Meanwhile it is the work of the parents to teach the child moral ethics.
Furthermore, ignoring negatives actions has a comeback effect on the child, the parents and also the community as a whole. Imagine, such a child grows up with a political ambition and finally found himself or herself on a political seat, he or she won’t be able to control his or stealing habit and therefore loot public wealth.
In conclusion, men of prestige celebrated today were not always praised for everything they did while growing up, at one point or the other, they were curbed for doing wrong things which brushed them up to have a good reputation. Therefore, the best way to teach is to praise positive actions and not ignore negative actions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-22 | Celestina Asantewaa | 50 | view |
| 2024-08-26 | aaa111 | 33 | view |
| 2024-07-13 | sepnkycehmqcodjefl | 50 | view |
| 2024-04-17 | guozhishan | 50 | view |
| 2023-12-28 | mei_unavailable | 83 | view |
- The following appeared in an article written by Dr Karp an anthropologist Twenty years ago Dr Field a noted anthropologist visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather tha 53
- the following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the super screen movie production company according to a recent report from our marketing department during the past few year fewer people attended the Super Screen Movie Production movie 50
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news During this time period most of the complian 37
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 199, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
...ct can tarnish the image of such child. Meanwhile it is the work of the parents to teach ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, really, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 12.4196629213 8% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 58.6224719101 51% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1358.0 2235.4752809 61% => OK
No of words: 284.0 442.535393258 64% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78169014085 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45341439913 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 215.323595506 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556338028169 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 704.065955056 60% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.2370786517 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.0070266934 60.3974514979 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.8 118.986275619 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4 23.4991977007 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.6 5.21951772744 261% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25867012437 0.243740707755 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143319958244 0.0831039109588 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123329625586 0.0758088955206 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140362382148 0.150359130593 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106629258599 0.0667264976115 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 100.480337079 58% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.