Society consists of divergence culture, mindset and behaviour. To understand the society, we have to examine the men and women both. Nowadays there is no gender inequality, Both women and men are contributing to society.
To illustrate, we should not only consider the character of the personality how are chooses as its heroes or its role models, instead, but we should also examine all the human being living in the society. Most of the people in society are struggling to get success. Few are got success through hard work and some kind of luck. Few people after getting success to attain some kind of arrogance, which is not good for society as well as for himself. For example, Indian very popular comedian show "The comedy night with Kapil". Kapil was a very gregarious person earlier, once his comedy show became all of a sudden very famous, Kapil started to get some arrogance in him. Kapil started talking in an impudent manner to the staff and the colleague. The ramification of this, most of the eminent character felt the show. And the TRP of the show became less. Conversely, Not all get arrogance attitude once got successful. But In the society from which Kapil belong will have the same behaviour. And people in Kapil society will not also like to behave in the same manner.
In addition to it, Many people in the society are not successful but create the indelible remark to the society, For instance, Ram helping the old person or blind in crossing the roads. Ram is not a heroic or a role model but the work he did more than being a hero. So society should not neglect all these activities, instead, try to appreciate and make an awesome awareness among other people of the society by evoking them to do helpful kind of stuff. WE can also take the example of Bollywood king Sharuk khan who has been caught spoking in the cricket stadium during IPL matches.
In contrast to it, Many great personalities create a profound example for others from which others get influence. For instance, Salman Khan who put on fitness challenges for the normal people of the world. Promulgate the effectiveness of being healthy and fit, help others how to become fit.
In conclusion, Not only the role model should be examined but the normal person should also be examined because society doesn't consist of only heroic people, there are many normal people as well.
- claim: Any piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted, since it may well be proven false in the future.Reason: Much of the information that people assume is factual actually turns out to be inaccurate. 50
- People's behaviour is largely determined by forces not of their own making. 58
- Originality does not mean thinking something that was never thought before; it means putting old ideas together in new ways. 33
- The following appeared in a memo from a vice president of Quiot Manufacturing."During the past year, Quiot Manufacturing had 30 percent more on-the-job accidents than at the nearby Panoply Industries plant, where the work shifts are one hour shorter 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 704, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER
Message: Consider replacing "in an impudent manner" with adverb for "impudent"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...arrogance in him. Kapil started talking in an impudent manner to the staff and the colleague. The ram...
Line 8, column 121, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
...should also be examined because society doesnt consist of only heroic people, there ar...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, if, so, well, as for, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, kind of, as well as, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 33.0505617978 45% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1974.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 412.0 442.535393258 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79126213592 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50530610838 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49743954092 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 215.323595506 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497572815534 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 630.0 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.9658432346 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.8260869565 118.986275619 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9130434783 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4347826087 5.21951772744 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233744080973 0.243740707755 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0626553755916 0.0831039109588 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0587045913771 0.0758088955206 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125042825174 0.150359130593 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0542227164826 0.0667264976115 81% => OK
automated_readability_index: 10.1 14.1392134831 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 12.1639044944 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 100.480337079 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.