The author concludes that the major cities should get more financial support because the cultural traditions are preserved and generated in these metropolises. However, in today's world, small villages may maintain more traditional factors. The support to culture protection should be combined in major cities and small villages. Furthermore, the spirits and other invisible aspects in cultural are also crucial to culture protection.
To begin with, more traditional factors, such as poetry, literature, and ballad, are inherited invisible, regardless of the area difference. These intangible factors are maintained in small villages easier than in cities, since the life style in huge cities are influenced by modern technology productions. For example, the popular music concert may replace the Shakespeare’s poetry in cities. The novels, like Harry Potter, may replace the Bible story in children’s hands. The fast food and set meal may replace the traditional food in most cases. However, in villages, the music concert is often few, and traditional stories may be talk more, so that the old value and spirits may be inherited more in villages than in cities. The protection for these things doesn’t need much financial support, but education and propagation.
From another perspective, more of the cultural factors may be remained in villages than in cities. The cities are more vulnerable in battles than villages. The complex politic turmoil, often happened in huge cities, also has negative influences on the culture protection. In small villages, the calm and steady life style are better for culture protection. Some old architectures remain only damaged structure, due to the war. For instance, the temple in Athens, and the old summer palace in Beijing. However, in small villages, some old structures can avoid the war damage.
Furthermore, some culture factors in big cities are hard and expensive to be maintained. However, in small villages, the cost to culture maintenance will be considerable lower than in the big cities. For instance, all the hoary architecture need work in maintenance. In huge cities, the worker employee fees are higher and the real estate value are far more higher than small villages. Except for the economic considerations, the rare places in major cities may be used for better benefits, such as hospitals, schools and so on. Taking the large numbers of people in metropolis into consideration, these infrastructures may be more practical and exigent for residents. Therefore, when the same traditional buildings exist in huge cities and small villages, the culture protection in small villages maybe more economical and advisable.
To sum up, both cities and villages have some kind of unique factor on cultural tradition. Small cities and villages may contain more old culture factors in some aspects, and the invisible things need more attention and should be educated to next generation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 354, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'higher' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: higher
...igher and the real estate value are far more higher than small villages. Except for the eco...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'furthermore', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'then', 'therefore', 'except for', 'for example', 'for instance', 'kind of', 'such as', 'in most cases', 'to begin with', 'to sum up']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.273244781784 0.240241500013 114% => OK
Verbs: 0.0967741935484 0.157235817809 62% => OK
Adjectives: 0.159392789374 0.0880659088768 181% => Less adjectives wanted.
Adverbs: 0.0417457305503 0.0497285424764 84% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0 0.0444667217837 0% => Some pronouns wanted.
Prepositions: 0.123339658444 0.12292977631 100% => OK
Participles: 0.0246679316888 0.0406280797675 61% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.87762044629 2.79330140395 103% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0151802656546 0.030933414821 49% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.00189753320683 0.0016655270985 114% => OK
Determiners: 0.0891840607211 0.0997080785238 89% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0284629981025 0.0249443105267 114% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00189753320683 0.0148568991511 13% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2949.0 2732.02544248 108% => OK
No of words: 460.0 452.878318584 102% => OK
Chars per words: 6.41086956522 6.0361032391 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6311565067 4.58838876751 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.417391304348 0.366273622748 114% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.332608695652 0.280924506359 118% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.228260869565 0.200843997647 114% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.163043478261 0.132149295362 123% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87762044629 2.79330140395 103% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 219.290929204 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.465217391304 0.48968727796 95% => OK
Word variations: 52.1292375757 55.4138127331 94% => OK
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6194690265 131% => OK
Sentence length: 17.037037037 23.380412469 73% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.665147462 59.4972553346 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.222222222 141.124799967 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.037037037 23.380412469 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.62962962963 0.674092028746 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.21349557522 19% => OK
Readability: 50.2979066023 51.4728631049 98% => OK
Elegance: 3.04109589041 1.64882698954 184% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.355742001354 0.391690518653 91% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.110513697145 0.123202303941 90% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0677029287323 0.077325440228 88% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.547390989013 0.547984918172 100% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.118796873672 0.149214159877 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154173266054 0.161403998019 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0709914345005 0.0892212321368 80% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.574510189521 0.385218514788 149% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0916769327103 0.0692045440612 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.275560664026 0.275328986314 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0628691749052 0.0653680567796 96% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.4325221239 105% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.30420353982 113% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88274336283 205% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 4.0 7.22455752212 55% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 3.66592920354 0% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 5.0 2.70907079646 185% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 13.5995575221 66% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations to cover all aspects.