Claim Young people s tendency to make extensive use of portable devices like smartphones and tablets has hurt their development of social skills Reason These devices encourage users to form artificial personalities and relationships online rather than ful

Essay topics:

Claim: Young people's tendency to make extensive use of portable devices like smartphones and tablets has hurt their development of social skills.
Reason: These devices encourage users to form artificial personalities and relationships online rather than fully and honestly engaging with the people around them.

The claim that young people's extensive use of portable devices like smartphones and tablets has hindered their development of social skills is a complex and multifaceted issue. While it is true that these devices have transformed the way we communicate and interact with others, it is an oversimplification to assert that they have solely contributed to the decline of social skills in young individuals. In this essay, I will argue that while portable devices may have some impact on social skills, they also offer unique opportunities for social engagement and personal growth.

To begin with, it is important to acknowledge that portable devices have indeed changed the way young people communicate. The prevalence of smartphones and tablets has led to an increase in online interactions, and some individuals may rely more on virtual interactions rather than face-to-face encounters. However, it is an oversimplification to attribute this shift solely to the use of portable devices. Other societal factors, such as the rise of social media platforms and the increasing importance placed on online presence, have also contributed to this phenomenon.

Moreover, portable devices can actually facilitate social connections and foster the development of social skills. Social media platforms, for instance, allow individuals to connect with a diverse range of people and engage in meaningful discussions. Online communities centered around shared interests can provide opportunities for collaboration, knowledge exchange, and even the development of leadership skills. In this way, portable devices can serve as a catalyst for social engagement and personal growth.

Additionally, the claim implies that the relationships formed online are inherently artificial and lack honesty. However, this assumption disregards the vast array of genuine and meaningful connections that can be forged through digital platforms. Many individuals find solace, support, and understanding within online communities. They are able to express themselves more freely and connect with others who share similar experiences or perspectives. The notion that these relationships are artificial oversimplifies the complex dynamics of human interaction and fails to recognize the emotional depth that can be achieved through digital means.

Furthermore, it is crucial to consider that social skills are not solely determined by face-to-face interactions. In today's interconnected world, the ability to navigate online spaces and engage with others digitally is becoming increasingly important. Developing digital literacy and proficiency in online communication can be valuable skills for young people, enabling them to thrive in an evolving technological landscape. It is essential to recognize that social skills encompass a broad spectrum of abilities, and the ability to effectively navigate both physical and virtual social environments is becoming increasingly relevant.

In conclusion, while it is true that the extensive use of portable devices has transformed the way young people interact and communicate, it is an oversimplification to assert that it has solely hindered the development of their social skills. These devices offer unique opportunities for social engagement, personal growth, and the formation of meaningful relationships. By recognizing the multifaceted nature of social skills and the potential benefits of digital interactions, we can foster a more nuanced understanding of the role that portable devices play in the social development of young individuals.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, it is true, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3057.0 2235.4752809 137% => OK
No of words: 520.0 442.535393258 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.87884615385 5.05705443957 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77530192783 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35116280711 2.79657885939 120% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 215.323595506 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.45 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 980.1 704.065955056 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.59117977528 119% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5293586082 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.913043478 118.986275619 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6086956522 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.91304347826 5.21951772744 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 10.2758426966 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.354316334003 0.243740707755 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109872676572 0.0831039109588 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0979714263104 0.0758088955206 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195741091651 0.150359130593 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0903126432205 0.0667264976115 135% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 14.1392134831 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 48.8420337079 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 12.1743820225 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.12 12.1639044944 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 153.0 100.480337079 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.7820224719 153% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.