College students should be encouraged to pursue subjects that interest them rather than the courses that seem most likely to lead to jobs.
In today's fast-paced world, where talent is highly valued, it is crucial to pursue a career in which one excels. While some argue that focusing solely on subjects aligned with potential job prospects is advantageous, I firmly disagree. In this essay, I will elaborate on the importance of encouraging college students to follow their passions rather than limiting themselves to courses solely for employment prospects.
Education is a fundamental right for all human beings, regardless of gender, race, or culture. Educational institutions play a crucial role in imparting knowledge, but they should not be confined to merely preparing students for specific job roles. Adopting such an approach would stifle personal growth and limit a student's potential for career advancement. For instance, if a student's goal is to become a supply chain analyst, it might seem logical to focus solely on subjects like logistics, Excel, and SQL. However, by concentrating solely on these subjects, the student could potentially hinder their ability to progress beyond that initial role. To excel in their career, individuals should continuously seek opportunities to learn, upgrade their skills, and explore new areas of knowledge.
Over the past few decades, technological advancements have grown exponentially, reshaping industries and job prospects. The question posed by Alan Turing in 1950, "Can machines think?" gave birth to the revolutionary field of Artificial Intelligence (AI). Automation driven by AI has led to significant changes in the job market, with many roles becoming obsolete. Take, for instance, the field of Information Technology (IT), which was once considered a promising career choice. However, with the increasing adoption of AI in the IT industry, several jobs have been replaced by machines, leaving individuals who solely focused on IT subjects in college at a disadvantage.
Despite this, colleges should not overlook the practical relevance of subjects in the industry. It is crucial for educational institutions to keep their curricula up-to-date, incorporating subjects that align with current market demands. This approach ensures that students are equipped with the necessary skills to meet industry requirements while still being encouraged to explore their interests beyond these confines.
In conclusion, a goal of education is not solely to secure a job but to foster personal growth and development. Although acquiring knowledge relevant to specific job roles is essential, it should not come at the cost of stifling a student's creativity and critical thinking abilities. By allowing students to pursue their interests, we enable them to discover their passions, think innovatively, and embrace a broader perspective. While being mindful of the ever-changing job market, we must not disregard the immense value of cultivating well-rounded individuals. Therefore, college students should be encouraged to strike a balance between practicality and passion, enriching their lives both personally and professionally.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 378, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
... career advancement. For instance, if a students goal is to become a supply chain analys...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 533, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: the; IT
..., with the increasing adoption of AI in the IT industry, several jobs have been replac...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 231, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...ould not come at the cost of stifling a students creativity and critical thinking abilit...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, so, still, therefore, well, while, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 58.6224719101 116% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2597.0 2235.4752809 116% => OK
No of words: 455.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.70769230769 5.05705443957 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61852021839 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14976264337 2.79657885939 113% => OK
Unique words: 272.0 215.323595506 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597802197802 0.4932671777 121% => OK
syllable_count: 806.4 704.065955056 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.9645584432 60.3974514979 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 118.045454545 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6818181818 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.90909090909 5.21951772744 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28295630451 0.243740707755 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0716921863687 0.0831039109588 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0556724986509 0.0758088955206 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151052858274 0.150359130593 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0493091665422 0.0667264976115 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 48.8420337079 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 12.1743820225 111% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.1639044944 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.46 8.38706741573 125% => OK
difficult_words: 168.0 100.480337079 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.