Creativity should be used as the only true measure of intelligence.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In
developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples
that could be used to challenge your position.
Intelligence is an aggregation of various factors such as knowledge, creativity, problem solving ability, decision making qualities and many more. A sole factor cannot define someone's intelligence. Hence considering creativity as only true measure of intelligence would be inappropriate. One is said to be intelligent when one excels in different abilities along with creativity.
Factors such as knowledge plays very vital role in defining intelligence. If a person with great creativity lacks domain knowledge cannot be considered as intelligent. An intelligent person should always be able to guide himself out of tedious and complex situations and so should have good decision-making ability. Many scholars who are considered intelligent person of their domains pose many other qualities than creativity. For instance, scholars such as Isaac Newton and Albert Einstein were not just creative but also leaders and influencers of that era.
Moreover, Intelligence is not something which can be measured on a definite scale. Rather it is subjective and varies with different scenarios. One can be called intelligent for having sound domain knowledge in field of research whereas just having sound knowledge is not enough for one who works in companies. However, creativity is also an important factor, creativity leads to new innovations and innovations are the roots of development. So, for an industry to grow and develop creativity is a key factor for it.
Hence creativity is a trait of intelligent personality but is not the only trait they pose. Thus, intelligence can only be measured by considering other factors in proportionate manner rather than biasing towards creativity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 199, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...or cannot define someones intelligence. Hence considering creativity as only true mea...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt abilities along with creativity. Factors such as knowledge plays very vit...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 84, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
...ch can be measured on a definite scale. Rather it is subjective and varies with differ...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... creativity is a key factor for it. Hence creativity is a trait of intellige...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...tivity is a key factor for it. Hence creativity is a trait of intelligent pe...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, moreover, so, thus, whereas, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 33.0505617978 18% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 58.6224719101 41% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1445.0 2235.4752809 65% => OK
No of words: 258.0 442.535393258 58% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6007751938 5.05705443957 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.55969084622 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18569991891 2.79657885939 114% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 215.323595506 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565891472868 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 704.065955056 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 6.24550561798 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.194914426 60.3974514979 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.3125 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.125 23.4991977007 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0625 5.21951772744 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199330108885 0.243740707755 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0751000213768 0.0831039109588 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0670976461041 0.0758088955206 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135087501503 0.150359130593 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0182291331094 0.0667264976115 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 14.1392134831 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 48.8420337079 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.9 12.1639044944 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 100.480337079 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.