Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.

In this fast-paced world, the high educational institutions are faced with increasing problems more than ever. Along those problems, there is one that most students and institutions would pay attentions with: Should the educational institution shoulder the obligation to set the requirement by which institutions could refuse those students not good enough? To some extent, It does make sense since it could indirectly enable unqualified students to find the appropriate field. However, it should be constrained within a reasonable range.

The educational institutions, such as universities, definitely should have the responsbility to guide the students' direction in a certain degree. In fact, universities in USA do make attemptions to guild their students. In the first two year of univeristy in USA, for the required courses, most students are only allowed to select some foundational ones which likewisely are the foundational courses of other fields. At the same time, students have a great number of selective courses of other majors, helping them find the majors they are really interested to. major tranfers is common and convenient. By this course structure, students could find their desired major and universities fulfill their responsbility as guide the students.

Nevertheless, the final decision subjected to the educational institution is clearly controversial with respect to the rights of student. Therefore students should own the decision to choose their future when they had sufficient understanding of different fields. According to a survey conducted in China by the HZNU, along those top students in different major, 50% of them claimed that the interest is the key supporting factor. Additionally, following panel study reveals that students motivated by interests have comparatively higher average salary and position compared to other students, indicating the interest is a important boosting factor in their career. The interest, however, is difficult to quantify. In this sence it should be left to the student to make the decision of the suitable field.

Still, the appropriate guidance from educational instituion are essential to students. There are several possible dilemmas from which innocent student could suffer. The interest is not a contributing factor all the time. For instance, in China, there a considerable number of high school student persuing to major in medicine and become a doctor by which they can achieve their goals as the professional and merciful life saver. Without knowing the exact required courses which cover tons of textbooks, they entered this major, and managed to fulfill all the requirements to graduate and finally become crestfallen by the low wages and risky working conditions of doctors in China. There could be a better return for all the effort of those students if the high school open a occupation introduction course. Therefore, the educational institution truly should shouder the responsiblity to prevent student from entering to inappropriate fields.

To sum up, the educational institution should be in charge of the commitment to preclude students from choosing the improper major by introducing all the potientially appropriate fields to student and left the decision to students thenselves. In this way, students could choose the right major and have a better career.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 107, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...uld have the responsbility to guide the students direction in a certain degree. In fact,...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 324, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...urses, most students are only allowed to select some foundational ones which like...
^^
Line 5, column 74, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...subjected to the educational institution is clearly controversial with respect to...
^^
Line 5, column 140, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... with respect to the rights of student. Therefore students should own the decision to cho...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 463, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng factor. Additionally, following panel study reveals that students motivated by...
^^
Line 5, column 625, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...er students, indicating the interest is a important boosting factor in their care...
^
Line 7, column 776, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... those students if the high school open a occupation introduction course. Therefo...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, likewise, nevertheless, really, so, still, then, therefore, for instance, in fact, such as, to sum up, with respect to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 58.6224719101 126% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2850.0 2235.4752809 127% => OK
No of words: 514.0 442.535393258 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54474708171 5.05705443957 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76146701107 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0452014181 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 255.0 215.323595506 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496108949416 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 877.5 704.065955056 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 14.0 4.38483146067 319% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.9852983114 60.3974514979 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.56 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.08 5.21951772744 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283394804664 0.243740707755 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0805150276665 0.0831039109588 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0605771599305 0.0758088955206 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177619224957 0.150359130593 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0334809846362 0.0667264976115 50% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.1639044944 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 139.0 100.480337079 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.