Educational institutions dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed because they are the ones who know the students academically and their performance in respective subjects but to this claim I disagree because a person can achieve success in any field be it if they haven't performed good academically. A student's interest can change at any point of time so this should not be the responsibility of institutions but the student itself.
To elaborate on the same claim, I'd like to elaborate on my own experience. I had computer application as a subject in my ninth and tenth standard where I had mere interest in the subject but when I changed my educational board from ICSE to CBSE, my interest in computers dwelled more deeper and took computers as my fifth subject. On appearing for high school board I secured good grades in the subject later to which I opted engineering as my undergraduation and now a computer science engineer who wants to pursue masters in data science domain. So, this is just the interest that grows in as per the age. So, institutes should not intervene in the field of study a student wants to pursue.
Adding more to the statement, there is a possibility a student might not know the intricate details and information about that particular field of study but by reading about it, having couselling done or a conversation with the person who belongs from that particular field of study might help a student know about the field more clearly and then let the student decide whether he/she wants to pursue the career in the same field of study. This kind of counselling can genuinely help student understand and ponder about the path to pursue. In the above quoted experience of myself the option that led me opt computers in eleventh standard was the course curriculum that interest me lot more to understand a language, how the computer works, how a particular language is written.
Dissuading students can sometimes result in wrong career guidance because the pace of education is very fast and revolutionary as with the e-learning solutions, many students start to do things which an adult might have never thought of. So with the internet being the ocean of sources students start to experiment things at a very early age and hence come out as shining stars. As it is known, observation is the key to innovation. This is very well proven with the young age kids that observe the changes around them and innovate them at much faster pace than adults.
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed 66
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people Recently however archa 45
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 311, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
...ieve success in any field be it if they havent performed good academically. A students...
Line 2, column 33, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
...tself. To elaborate on the same claim, Id like to elaborate on my own experience....
Line 2, column 279, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE
Message: Use only 'deeper' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
... CBSE, my interest in computers dwelled more deeper and took computers as my fifth subject....
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, so, then, well, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2093.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 434.0 442.535393258 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82258064516 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56428161445 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7537685649 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506912442396 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 662.4 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 23.0359550562 135% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 110.663882536 60.3974514979 183% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.5 118.986275619 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.0 23.4991977007 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.78571428571 5.21951772744 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347807297123 0.243740707755 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0978055418139 0.0831039109588 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126202499642 0.0758088955206 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206183191937 0.150359130593 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.140619165221 0.0667264976115 211% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
automated_readability_index: 16.8 14.1392134831 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.27 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 100.480337079 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 11.2143820225 128% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.