The effectiveness of a country's leaders cannot be examined exhaustively only by assessing the well-being of citizens. There are several circumstances that a country has to face and it is not possible for a leader to consider only the well-being of its citizen always. Leaders might have to make decisions that affect the population in negative ways but as a whole are good for the growth of the country.
To begin with, there is always a trade-off between the economic growth and the preservation of nature. Take an example of a country where people long for jobs and consistent availability of bread and butter is precarious, denying the construction of new paper manufacturing factory affects the well-being of citizens negatively. The country might not have enough green areas and preserving them could be the need of the hour. For example the middle-east countries, where major population consists of labours and only jobs they get is in construction or oil refineries. They cannot setup a paper manufacturing industries only to appease their citizens.
Additionally, the national security of country is another factor. Leader's have many times decided to invest huge sums in purchasing fire power instead of providing food for the starving and shelter for the homeless. This does decreases the felicity of residents but ensures that those who already have food and home get to keep it that away, safe from threats of foreign invasion. Every country does this, providing any specific example would only undermine the gravity of argument.
Moreover, Financial crisis is a big pain area for any country. Decision have to be made to prevent any near future financial mishaps that might hinder the growth of country. Take for an example, the move to ban 500,1000 legal tenders in India decreased its GDP, hindered day to day life and decreased business. Almost every citizen suffered, but the leader received support from citizens, as they knew that these problems are only temporary and this will only bring their country a brighter tomorrow.
Conclusively, for any leader it is not always possible to consider the felicity of citizens. Sometimes their decisions might give importance to other things also.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 261, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[3]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually not used at the end of a sentence.
...ider only the well-being of its citizen always. Leaders might have to make decisions t...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 226, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'decrease'.
Suggestion: decrease
...and shelter for the homeless. This does decreases the felicity of residents but ensures t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 157, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...s might give importance to other things also.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, well, as to, for example, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1852.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 359.0 442.535393258 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15877437326 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79987662766 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 215.323595506 89% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534818941504 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 587.7 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.740449438202 135% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7669899817 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.888888889 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9444444444 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.21951772744 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17777515638 0.243740707755 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0626098098397 0.0831039109588 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0623871572325 0.0758088955206 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107897804753 0.150359130593 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0632755225884 0.0667264976115 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.1392134831 91% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 100.480337079 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.