Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and to disobey and resist unjust laws.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Nations in the world govern based on certain laws. The governments of different nations also stipulate laws for the citizens to be followed diligently keeping in mind the wellfare of their citizens. The prompt suggests that the people in a society has an obligation to follow only just laws and renounce and denounce unjust laws. I don't agree with the promt and feel that all laws should be followed assiduously for the following reasons.
Firstly, laws in a country play a vital role in the progress of a nation. Laws are made and passed by a government to ensure harmony in the society, to protect the rights of the under privileged or for the safety of the people as a whole. Laws are passed only when there is a desideratum for them as the government may not be able to acheive its intended goal otherwise. To emphasize, laws are not passed for sake of pretending that the government is working or to place burden on the commonman. There will be a rationale behind every law and it should be the duty of every citizen to each law studiously. This way, the government can ensure justice to a section of people if there is injustice being caused to that particular sectoin of people interms of racial descrimination, pecunary descrimination, gender descrimination, etc. While some laws ensure that people of different cultures and myriad diversities leave in congruous relationships without causing any dissonance, other laws ensure public safety such a traffic rules. Thus, it is apparent that laws form an indespensable part of our lives, whether we like them or, have to be followed for the sake of ourselves as well as for the sake of others.
Secondly, if the people have the responsibility to follow only just laws and reprehend ujust laws, an important question arises. Who will be deciding what are just laws and what are not? In a scenario where people have the latitude to diffrentiate just laws from unjust laws, there is every possibility people treat them with intrinsic biasness. This predilection inherent in the people will make them falsely classify some laws as just and other laws as unjust. What a law seems just to a group of people may not seem the same to another group of people. As we can blatantly see, such a situation can give rise to discord betweent the people and eventually to a melee.
Some might argue that in places run by autocrates, there will definitely be just laws as well as unjust laws. In such a situation, yes, the society should expostulate unjust laws while adhering only to the just laws. However, if the society runs on democracy, it is imperative that all laws are followed without any exception as such governments takes into account the well being of the whole nation.
To recapitulate, it should be the incumbency of the people of a society to follow all laws as they are made for a purpose but not encumber the lives of the people. If following the laws is left to the discretion of the people, it is sure to cause pandenomium in the society.
- The best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting your 58
- In any field of inquiry the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In 66
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your posi 66
- The following is a letter to the editor of an environmental magazine In 1975 a wildlife census found that there were seven species of amphibians in Xanadu National Park with abundant numbers of each species However in 2002 only four species of amphibians 66
- Chaco great houses 70
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 333, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...nd renounce and denounce unjust laws. I dont agree with the promt and feel that all ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1015, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'traffic'.
Suggestion: traffic
...e, other laws ensure public safety such a traffic rules. Thus, it is apparent that laws f...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2489.0 2235.4752809 111% => OK
No of words: 525.0 442.535393258 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74095238095 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78673985869 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73448722948 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.438095238095 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 801.9 704.065955056 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3542535967 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.217391304 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8260869565 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.52173913043 5.21951772744 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225578051536 0.243740707755 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.084444387654 0.0831039109588 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458791816891 0.0758088955206 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147042481022 0.150359130593 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0218579150236 0.0667264976115 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 100.480337079 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 333, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...nd renounce and denounce unjust laws. I dont agree with the promt and feel that all ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1015, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'traffic'.
Suggestion: traffic
...e, other laws ensure public safety such a traffic rules. Thus, it is apparent that laws f...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2489.0 2235.4752809 111% => OK
No of words: 525.0 442.535393258 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74095238095 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78673985869 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73448722948 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.438095238095 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 801.9 704.065955056 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3542535967 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.217391304 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8260869565 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.52173913043 5.21951772744 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225578051536 0.243740707755 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.084444387654 0.0831039109588 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458791816891 0.0758088955206 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147042481022 0.150359130593 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0218579150236 0.0667264976115 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 100.480337079 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.