Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain y

Essay topics:

Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.

Any government when comes to power faces some immediate problems, which requires immediate actions. It could be due to the poor policies made by earlier government or a persistent problem(s) that the nation faces for a long time, e.g., economic slowdown, poverty, unemployment, etc. The prompt suggests that the government should focus more on the immediate problems than the anticipated problems. I mostly agree with the prompt and will elaborate on my position with three examples.

Firstly, considering a democratic government which is elected based on the promises that it made during their election campaign. The government then obliged to fulfill all the promises that were part of their memorandum. In most of the cases, the main problems that influence the voters are preexisting in nature. For example, the current government of India, the world’s largest democracy, wins the poll with landslide victory since they promised to control the corruption and take immediate actions against those accused, which is at that time the country’s biggest problem. If, however, the government contested the poll for some future anticipated problems like climate change, etc. It is highly unlikely that the government would have won the elections. So it binds the government to fulfill the immediate problems rather than focuses on the problems of the future.

Secondly, if the country is facing a very severe problem (e.g., pollution, inflation, unemployment, economic recession, etc.), which can affect the entire population. It doesn’t make sense that the government should focus on any other problem but that. For example, Pakistan is currently facing an economic problem due to various national debts and corruption and the problem of terrorism. If the government doesn’t take any action to make policies that address those issues. It has the potential to affect the entire population as that may lead to many other problems like unemployment, poverty, etc. This forced the government to solve immediate problems as compared to future problems.

Lastly, if a country is alarmed by their plummeting GDP numbers that indicate that the country is facing an economic slowdown, and heading towards an economic recession. And if the government doesn’t take any actions at that time, it is inevitable that the country will suffer from the recession and millions have to lose their jobs. This can have drastic consequences for any country. For example, India, which was one of the fastest-growing economies, is currently facing an economic slowdown, and the government of India is taking every possible measure to improve the country’s economic condition. Hence, in these cases, the government must focus on future problems than present problems.

In conclusion, whether the government should focus on solving present or future problems actually depends upon the gravity of the problem, and the country should take every possible action to tackle it as it can affect the lives of many people.

Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:


Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 181, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'problem'?
Suggestion: problem
...e by earlier government or a persistent problems that the nation faces for a long time, ...

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, e.g., first, firstly, hence, however, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, so, then, for example, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.3162921348 186% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 12.9106741573 194% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2564.0 2235.4752809 115% => OK
No of words: 471.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44373673036 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65859790218 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85891648595 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.458598726115 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 784.8 704.065955056 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.8643319276 60.3974514979 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.545454545 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4090909091 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.63636363636 5.21951772744 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 5.13820224719 272% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287103109163 0.243740707755 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101846193256 0.0831039109588 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0835962617784 0.0758088955206 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188275053749 0.150359130593 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0603387704262 0.0667264976115 90% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.1639044944 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 100.480337079 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?


Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.