Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The author clearly says that the government should not try to solve the future anticipated problems rather firstly, they should be focused to solve the immediate problems. I agree with the statement that is given by the author. The priority to solve the problems should be done first that are more required resource than the other.
Firstly, the government is elected by the people, so the government should give priority to solve the problems of the people and then do any development activities. For example, the citizens are facing the problem of drinking water. The government is providing the drinking water once for every two days, it makes problem to the citizens. But the government is going to construct the barriers between the roads. Constructing the barriers between the roads is a good work to avoid the traffic problems. The government should first focus on the problem of drinking water because it is the essential requirement for the citizens rather than constructing the barriers between the roads.
The recommendation of the statement given by the author is advantageous because it fulfill the basic requirement needs to the citizens and helpful to solve their problems quickly. By solving the immediate problems firstly, there will be no pressure on the government that they did not focus on the immediate problems facing by the citizens. Solving the problems that are to be done immediately, the anticipated problems that occur in the future become immediate problems in the future and easily solve those problems in the future.
The author perspective towards the problems of immediate to the problems of the future is a good thought to solve the problem that are more required to the people. Thus, the government should effectively solve the immediate problems and have a plan to solve the problems that occur in the future, and implement soon after the immediate requirement problem is solved.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...more required resource than the other. Firstly, the government is elected by th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ucting the barriers between the roads. The recommendation of the statement give...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 128, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'fulfills'?
Suggestion: fulfills
...y the author is advantageous because it fulfill the basic requirement needs to the citi...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y solve those problems in the future. The author perspective towards the probl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 330, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...plan to solve the problems that occur in the future, and implement soon after the...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, so, then, thus, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 58.6224719101 63% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1606.0 2235.4752809 72% => OK
No of words: 314.0 442.535393258 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11464968153 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73869055951 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 215.323595506 55% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.375796178344 0.4932671777 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 493.2 704.065955056 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4110724599 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.714285714 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4285714286 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42857142857 5.21951772744 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 10.2758426966 19% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.40915069288 0.243740707755 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.169525259113 0.0831039109588 204% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108629547598 0.0758088955206 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.302611463308 0.150359130593 201% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0767276017409 0.0667264976115 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 100.480337079 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.