Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The speaker asserts that government should not focus on solving short-term problems but future problems. I totally disagree with the speaker. In my view, governments should not tackle one of them but tackle both of them. I will use some aspects explain my view, considering extremely condition: focusing on solving only long-term or only short-term problems.
Solving the problems is the responsibility of governments. Governments have to maintain social order constantly, to provide welfare of people, and to protect people from attacks by criminal. To perform this duty, governments should deal with both immediate and anticipated problems. Although the problems focused on the short term by the government can see an immediate effect, these are not a good operation in the long term if long-term problems were ignored. The unemployment rate is good example. When unemployment rate are increasing, Governments must reckon what is main problems and then consider how they solve unemployment in the long term except for giving unemployment compensation. In a word, governments should not tackle one problems that are immediate or future problems, but should consider both anticipated problems and short-term problems.
Focusing on solving only immediate problems has a negative effect on country. Since long-term problems and short-term problems have a significant correlation, if governments not tackle the short-term problems, how can they handle long-term problems? Solving the immediate problems plays a key role in long-term problems, such as national development. National development must deal with immediate project process, and then do a long-term planning. Without dealing with project process, long-term planning will not be handled well. Therefore, the government should not stop handling immediate problems in order to tackle future problems. In short, since long-term problems and short-terms problems have a correlation, governments could not choose dealing with one of them.
Further, considering long-term problems has a positive influence on solving short-term problems. To solve the social problems, such as the increasing crime rate, the government should solve short-term problems completely. Because those immediate social disorders will cause serious long-term problems in the long run, it is necessary to deal with. For example, we consider COVID-19 should be a short-term problem originally, but it has become a long-running problem due to the negligence of everyone. In brief, Government should solve the short-term problems completely to effectively tackle long-term problems.
In sum, since long-term problems and short-term problems have a significant correlation, government should not deal with only one of them. So, I fundamentally disagree with speaker.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 736, Rule ID: ONE_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use the numeral 'one' with plural words. Did you mean 'one problem', 'a problem', or simply 'problems'?
Suggestion: one problem; a problem; problems
...n a word, governments should not tackle one problems that are immediate or future problems, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 746, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to deal'.
Suggestion: to deal
...rrelation, governments could not choose dealing with one of them. Further, considerin...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 444, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...m problem originally, but it has become a long-running problem due to the negligence of everyo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, then, therefore, well, except for, for example, in brief, in short, such as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2381.0 2235.4752809 107% => OK
No of words: 412.0 442.535393258 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.77912621359 5.05705443957 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50530610838 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07836180241 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 215.323595506 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.412621359223 0.4932671777 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 686.7 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 14.0 4.38483146067 319% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.1376031592 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.24 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.48 23.4991977007 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.21951772744 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 10.2758426966 19% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 20.0 5.13820224719 389% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251117269486 0.243740707755 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124911474017 0.0831039109588 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0734801524331 0.0758088955206 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198217257627 0.150359130593 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.025958618967 0.0667264976115 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.95 12.1639044944 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 100.480337079 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.8971910112 46% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.