Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Scientific development is backbone for the development of our society. Due to immense scientific discoveries in the past five decades, various countries have improved the health care for their people. The prompt says that Governments should place few or if possible, no restrictions on the scientific research and development. From my point of view, I am more aligned with the point of view that government should place few, restrictions on scientific research and development due to the following two reasons. However, I do concede that the government regulations are required in some specific fields of scientific research and development.
Firstly, the monetary funding is the most important thing that keeps scientific research and development ongoing in our world. Currently, most of the technical funding is done by private investors and various companies. However, if government puts strict restrictions on the scientific research then most of the private investors would back out. As a consequence, the government might not be able to fill the monetary void created by companies not willing to fund such research.
Secondly, most of the bleeding edge research is being done by the private sector. And we are all aware of the fact that private sector is more flexible at adapting to various situations as compared to the government sector. For example, In 2019 there was a world wide Covid-19 pandemic. Billions of people all over the world were affected, all of the world went under lockdown, to contain the virus. Also, millions of people lost their lives. The governments of all the countries were trying their best to save the lives of their citizens. But there were some pharmaceutical companies working day and night so as to develop the vaccine for the virus. After 15 months of continuous research and testing, Pfizer rolled out their vaccine for corona virus that ended the nation wide lockdown in The United States. Since the vaccine was created in record time, it saved millions of lives all over the world. All of this would not be possible if the government had applied strict regulations on the scientific development of pharmaceuticals.
On the other hand, nuclear science is a very sensitive topic. Nuclear energy can be used to generate nuclear power plants to generate electricity without polluting our environment. But it can also be used to create nuclear bombs that can destroy cities in one blast. Imagine a nuclear research going unchecked by the government. For example, a terrorist organization can have access to nuclear weapons. They would create havoc on earth. Hence, for our own safety we need government restrictions on the research of such sensitive technologies.
Thus, from the above reasonings it is evident that putting stringent regulations on the development of technology is not a wise decision. Nevertheless, there should be some regulation imposed on the scientific research by the government, in order to ensure that the technology being developed is being used for the benefit of the mankind and not for the destruction of our society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 386, Rule ID: NOW[3]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
... As a consequence, the government might no be able to fill the monetary void creat...
^^
Line 5, column 258, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: worldwide
...ector. For example, In 2019 there was a world wide Covid-19 pandemic. Billions of people ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 258, Rule ID: WORLD_WIDE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'worldwide'?
Suggestion: worldwide
...ector. For example, In 2019 there was a world wide Covid-19 pandemic. Billions of people ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 268, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... example, In 2019 there was a world wide Covid-19 pandemic. Billions of people al...
^^
Line 5, column 342, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...eople all over the world were affected, all of the world went under lockdown, so as to con...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 380, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
..., all of the world went under lockdown, so as to contain the virus. Also, millions of pe...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 615, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...eutical companies working day and night so as to develop the vaccine for the virus. Afte...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 775, Rule ID: NATION_WIDE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nationwide'?
Suggestion: nationwide
...vaccine for corona virus that ended the nation wide lockdown in The United States. Since th...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 818, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ion wide lockdown in The United States. Since the vaccine was created in record time ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 123, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...e used to generate nuclear power plants so as to generate electricity without polluting ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 239, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
... scientific research by the government, so as to ensure that the technology being develo...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, then, thus, as to, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 12.9106741573 178% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2597.0 2235.4752809 116% => OK
No of words: 501.0 442.535393258 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18363273453 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73107062784 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.931851056 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 215.323595506 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.471057884232 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 789.3 704.065955056 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.7854608864 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.75 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8928571429 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 5.21951772744 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 7.80617977528 141% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200893197673 0.243740707755 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0579341586507 0.0831039109588 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0611206079164 0.0758088955206 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123155147132 0.150359130593 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0755394984342 0.0667264976115 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 14.1392134831 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 100.480337079 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.