Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Our modern world is so advanced today because of the good work done by scientists and researchers’ hard and consistent work and remarkable ideas. We would not be this advanced in technological and sociological ways if it were not for the outstanding innovations made by them. It is they who made it possible for the world to fight and survive numerous diseases. Their constant hard work in research made it possible for the world to overcome the recent pandemic that is the covid-19. They studied the virus and its different strains and came up with the vaccinations and thus saving millions of lives. And not only for the covid-19, but research also made it possible for mankind to survive several deadly diseases from smallpox, Spanish flu, and plague to the modern world diseases like covid-19.
However, all these were not possible without several trials which may include having animals as test subjects. This practice is in existence since ancient times. Since animals do not have a voice, we think it is our right to use them as test subjects and carry on the tests which may be fatal for them. Not all research needs to test on animals but there are still some experiments that scientists carry out by testing on voiceless innocent animals. If governments could impose some restrictions on animal usage for testing then unnecessary tests which lead to animal cruelty may be eradicated. It will preserve our animal kingdom and several innocent animals will be granted their freedom for life.
Research and development also need several tests to be done for creating explosives. It not only damages resources and the earth but also risks the lives of all the people involved. And our nature is already at stake due to global warming and pollution but even then, numerous tests related to technological inventions are carried out which increases harm to mother earth. For example, sparrows which were one of the most common birds to be seen are now rarely seen. This is because there has been a drastic decrease in their population because of electromagnetic waves produced by cellphone towers.
Our nature is constantly attacked because of such development and scientific research. Surely development and innovations have benefitted us all but there must be a limit for every practice because if in the end the world does not survive then how will this development be useful? And such limitations can only be imposed by the government. Thus, putting some restrictions on scientific research and development will not harm or reduce the advancement of the world but it will surely be a boon to our nature and eventually mankind.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, still, then, thus, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 28.0 14.8657303371 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2197.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 441.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98185941043 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58257569496 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72285845682 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487528344671 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 689.4 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9379738518 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.619047619 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.21951772744 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130251296267 0.243740707755 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0435710543926 0.0831039109588 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0366763354288 0.0758088955206 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.084402356915 0.150359130593 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0238847198307 0.0667264976115 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 100.480337079 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, still, then, thus, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 28.0 14.8657303371 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2197.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 441.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98185941043 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58257569496 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72285845682 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487528344671 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 689.4 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9379738518 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.619047619 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.21951772744 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130251296267 0.243740707755 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0435710543926 0.0831039109588 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0366763354288 0.0758088955206 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.084402356915 0.150359130593 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0238847198307 0.0667264976115 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 100.480337079 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.