GRE Issue:Claim: The surest indicator of a great nation must be the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists.Reason: Great achievements by a nation's rulers, artists, or scientists will ensure a good life for the majority of that nation's people

In this world, the countries are recognized as ‘great nations’ mostly because of it’s all round progress in each and every factors of the society that supplements it’s denizens’ welfare. There is no single significant example where the rulers or artists of the nations that wittingly increased this factor of ‘greatness’ of the country but is true inversely. Thus, I strongly agree that greatness of the country cannot be attributed to the achievements of it’s rulers, artists or scientists.

The country is made up by the people. If there is no internal peace among the people, then the chaotic conditions do not let any of the individuals to achieve significantly. For example, the country of Pakistan which is known to have the great singers (artists), cricket players as well as the Nobel peace prize winners like Malala, is identified as the ‘terrorist shelter-giver’ world wide. Even the very infamous Osama bin laden was killed in Abotabad of Pakistan which made the country’s name get plummeted amongst the peace keeping countries. There are terrorists activities in a regukar manner in the country which do not let the people to be in the harmonious manner. The people hardly could get esconced in such country which is unambiguously called as not so great nation despite of great achievements of it’s leaders as well as the artists.
Hence, the fame of the country is directly dependent on the welfare of people.

Even though there are artists as well as good leaders in the country like Pakistan as mentioned previously, the country might not be called as the great nation. For example, Soviet Union which was known as one of the greatest influencing country in the world in each and every factors after world war 2, the iniquitous act of Chernobyl by it’s very own great achieved Scientists lead them to exclude the land of more than 2 thousand square kilometers. This was to avoid the Radiations from the Chernobyl nuclear reactor which was plummeted by the activities of the Nuclear scientists. Thus, from this substantiation we can know that ‘great names’ may not make the nation great but can absolutely make the country’s name get infamous.

Even if the country donot have the great leaders, it might get known to be great. The country which has the minimum army to protect. Which is in the apogee of the developments as well as the country which is known to be one of the most lovable countries to reside in- Iceland. The country of Iceland which is known to be one of the safest lands on earth because it’s rulers earn name to maintain the welfare of it’s country internally more than externally. This exemplifies analogically and supports the given prompt.

In a nutshell, according to me, the achievements of the particular person who has his country’s name besides his name might make his country proud but do not make the country great. There are various factors that has to be considered to set the countries in the list of great countries. Where in the welfare of the people is the major aspect that comes first.

Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 389, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: worldwide
...the 'terrorist shelter-giver' world wide. Even the very infamous Osama bin laden...
Line 3, column 389, Rule ID: WORLD_WIDE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'worldwide'?
Suggestion: worldwide
...the 'terrorist shelter-giver' world wide. Even the very infamous Osama bin laden...
Line 10, column 293, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Where” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...untries in the list of great countries. Where in the welfare of the people is the maj...

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, hence, if, may, so, then, thus, well, as to, for example, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 58.6224719101 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 12.9106741573 8% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2624.0 2235.4752809 117% => OK
No of words: 520.0 442.535393258 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04615384615 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77530192783 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99997781057 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 215.323595506 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.438461538462 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 796.5 704.065955056 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.7950491478 60.3974514979 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.272727273 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6363636364 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.04545454545 5.21951772744 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276959256657 0.243740707755 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0951655573322 0.0831039109588 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0857950204575 0.0758088955206 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155164253123 0.150359130593 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101925888689 0.0667264976115 153% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 100.480337079 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?


Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.