Imagination is a more valuable asset than experience.
People without Imagination are merely machines. Without the ability to create a different world inside our brains, free of constraints, and sometimes logic, we would not be able to accomplish a lot of things as humans. The prompt claims that imagination is a more valuable asset than experience. However, in my opinion that is not the case. I disagree for two main reasons.
First of all, the prompt claims that imagination is more valuable due to the fact that people wanting experience are free of the constraints of habits and attitudes, that may be true, but the lack of experience will cost them knowledge of the applicability of the idea. If we imagined a six-year-old child free of any constraint the real world may have on his or her ideas, we might find the craziest and most absurd of ideas a human brain may come up with. That does not mean that these ideas are of any use in the real world. Experience in there situation help the person to analyze the idea. The previous example shows that lack of experience may not always lead to useful ideas.
Second of all, the prompt argues that experience (in a way) lead to lack of creativity, due to the exposure of entrenched habits and attitudes from the environment. That may not be the case, but I would argue that it is the complete opposite. Experience in a field will most certainly lead to exposure to other related (and sometimes unrelated) fields. This exposure will help the experienced worker understand the issues and problems workers in other fields face and how they approach it, which will give him or her new ideas that may be useful in his or here field. By looking at the field of scientific research we can recognize a pattern in novel ideas, they are almost always influenced by different research fields. The aforementioned example illustrates how experience can cause creativity by exposure to the established norms.
One might argue that a lot of the creations we use today derives from wild imaginations. This may be true, however, the development of the idea under established and tested rules is the reason this idea became more than an abstract thought. It is the collective experience of hundreds of scientific generations who laid down the route for these ideas to become a reality.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, may, second, so, as to, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1889.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 392.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81887755102 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74066512264 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 215.323595506 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492346938776 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 595.8 704.065955056 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.7111042505 60.3974514979 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4210526316 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6315789474 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.31578947368 5.21951772744 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150838216223 0.243740707755 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0603395215135 0.0831039109588 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.173659554499 0.0758088955206 229% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11502944592 0.150359130593 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119623773923 0.0667264976115 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.1392134831 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 100.480337079 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.