This topic raises the controversial issue whether people are prefer to welcoming and accepting innovation and new ideas more than applying them in the real life. Indisputably, that we live advance stage of life and all these advancements come from applying innovative ideas is not plausible reaching this stage of improvement comes from welcoming the new ideas, and there are myriad of examples assure my point. Hence, I generally disagree with the issue statement. To substantiate my case this essay will elaborate my reasons and examples.
To begin with, the first and the foremost point coming to the mind is amount of benefits that comes by applying these outstanding ideas. In other words, I would like to point out the first benefit by compering our life today and the life before 20 years ago, is it the same? Is it in the same level of comforte? The answer simply no, adopting new ideas make the life easy and without any complication, because from the gaps come the solutions. One vivid example is our smart phones by your phone you can speak, play, take a photo or chat any one from your place in contrast in the past if you want to phone someone he has to go to the call center to get the call. Consequently, it is pretty obvious that adopting new ideas make the life easier than the past.
Second vital point that should be taken into consideration that people became more educated and open minded and all the time there are looking to save their time and effort to invest every single second with more useful things. Thirdly, the truth that people nature eager to discover and try what is new, and almost all the new ideas come from old version with a little bit modification that will benefit more people.
In conclusion, due to the aforementioned reasons and examples I think adopting new ideas create a state of development and it has a positive impact on the people life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 72, Rule ID: PREFER_TO_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'welcome'?
Suggestion: welcome
...sial issue whether people are prefer to welcoming and accepting innovation and new ideas ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 455, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nce, I generally disagree with the issue statement. To substantiate my case this ...
^^
Line 3, column 539, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'anyone'?
Suggestion: anyone
...u can speak, play, take a photo or chat any one from your place in contrast in the past...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 364, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
... new ideas come from old version with a little bit modification that will benefit more peo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, hence, if, look, second, so, third, thirdly, as to, i think, in conclusion, in contrast, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1571.0 2235.4752809 70% => OK
No of words: 333.0 442.535393258 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71771771772 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48377940871 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558558558559 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 704.065955056 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.3474297542 60.3974514979 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.846153846 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6153846154 23.4991977007 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6923076923 5.21951772744 205% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217495436394 0.243740707755 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0737226832932 0.0831039109588 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0742751098484 0.0758088955206 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130150743619 0.150359130593 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0407054008526 0.0667264976115 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.1392134831 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 100.480337079 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.