It is easy to welcome innovation and accept new ideas. What most people find difficult,
however, is accepting the way these new ideas are put into practice.
Welcoming new ideas and accepting them is common as this is claimed as appreciating innovation. it could be difficult to adapt with the changes that come along with accepting innovation in real life. However, this difficulty can not be considered as severe as innovation would not have been this popular if it was not appropriate in practice.
It is a matter of time to be accustomed with the change that is brought through innovation. In the era of fast changing generation, change is inevitable and it could be hardly considered as a cumbersome task to adapt with the change. Technology is taking over anything that was in practice for ages. For instance, there is no fax machine in an updated office that was in practice for ages as it has been replaced by high functioning computers and printers. No more telephones are visible as video calls and emails have replaced this medium of communication.If accepting these changes were that difficult there would have been severe objection for not changing such obsolete mediums.
In academics,where age old professors who taught the students with with pen and paper and continued his researches with books and papers are now shifting to computer and technology based system for these tasks. Even a 70 year old is not bothered with the change, rather happy to be well facilitated, let alone anyone from the new generation to be bothered with the practice. A student would be highly benefited with the amenities being offered by the new ideas and innovations and would come out bigger and better with all these innovations as an individual for the future and would be fitter to survive while facing the upcoming challenges.
Governments and authorities are being more accepted by the nation for taking technology as the way of ruling the nation. The age old voting system with paper based ballots is being replaced by Electro voting machines which is a matter of new experience for the voters. An increment of participation in election is observed for which it could be claimed as a salubrious system instead of a hassling one.
In conclusion, innovation in practice may cause hassle for the senior citizens who are not updated, yet the proportion of this particular population is quite low and the majority would be highly benefited in practising innovation and would welcome the change cheerfully.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 97, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
... is claimed as appreciating innovation. it could be difficult to adapt with the ch...
^^
Line 3, column 558, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: If
...e replaced this medium of communication.If accepting these changes were that diffi...
^^
Line 5, column 13, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , where
... such obsolete mediums. In academics,where age old professors who taught the stude...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 63, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: with
... old professors who taught the students with with pen and paper and continued his researc...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, well, while, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 36.0 19.5258426966 184% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1966.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 392.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01530612245 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.861489951 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.484693877551 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 632.7 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.0964410113 60.3974514979 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.066666667 118.986275619 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1333333333 23.4991977007 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.13333333333 5.21951772744 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151175499345 0.243740707755 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0623293913419 0.0831039109588 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0698489021309 0.0758088955206 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0985872965028 0.150359130593 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0542299134821 0.0667264976115 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.