It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure

This topic raises the controversial issue whether societies no longer regards living man or woman as a hero. Indisputably, that there are a lot of outstanding persons and they have great given teeth in our societies in general. Therefore, I totally disagree that society does not have to consider man and woman as a hero due to their valuable actions to change the world for the best. Hence, to substantiate my case this essay will elaborate my reasons and examples clearly.

To begin with, it is irrefutable that all the revolutions that we are living and facing due to people have great minds and abilities plus they are wanted to change the world to better conditions. On one hand, the first point is that societies have to consider those people to appreciate their effort and that will lead to encourage them to do their best. In other words, societies have to venerate who has an outstanding abilities and clear mind to burgeon their societies.

Furthermore, the second vital point that should be taken into account that societies have to consider them because their action in this world speaks loudly and there are a lot of follower are interested in their achievements. Further illustration requires taking a look at this example, Neutin as a laudable scientist, all of us know how much this person has changed different aspects of science and because of his science there are myriad of people continue taking and improving his success and the vivid point that there are a lot of new discovers has followed what nuetin did. Consequently, it is pretty obvious that societies have to consider those people because they have changed this world.

Last but not least, the contrary point of view might state that societies do not have to regard any living man or woman, but the point here without the current generation we cannot move forward and prosper our daily living. Thus, it is hard to take their claim into consideration.

All in all, due to aforementioned reasons ad examples, societies ought to continue considers the living man and woman because they are holding our present and future for further developments and the regarding process will galvanize them to do new things and using their innovative thinking methods for further movement.

Votes
Average: 7.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 181, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lot of outstanding persons and they have great given teeth in our societies in ge...
^^
Line 5, column 171, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun follower seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of followers'.
Suggestion: a lot of followers
... this world speaks loudly and there are a lot of follower are interested in their achievements. F...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 35, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'reasons'' or 'reason's'?
Suggestion: reasons'; reason's
...n. All in all, due to aforementioned reasons ad examples, societies ought to continu...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, if, look, regarding, second, so, therefore, thus, in general, in other words, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 33.0505617978 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1884.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 380.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95789473684 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63943039268 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513157894737 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 583.2 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 85.0122163167 60.3974514979 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.923076923 118.986275619 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.2307692308 23.4991977007 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5384615385 5.21951772744 202% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144175134988 0.243740707755 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0620494324518 0.0831039109588 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0667824042919 0.0758088955206 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0962158000854 0.150359130593 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0574761425809 0.0667264976115 86% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 14.1392134831 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.08 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 100.480337079 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.