Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Laws form a strong framework within which society functions, meaning that well thought out laws and their correct implementation are of utmost importance for the smooth functioning of any society (institutions, offices, states. countries). This is precisely why I believe that judicial systems should take into account the circumstances, times and places involved in the lawsuit while delivering justice.
One size fits all may work for a pair of socks, but that sure isn't the case with laws. For example, taking a look at a financial crime, more specifically, that of not repaying a loan, a daily wage worker who has been unable to secure any sort of work for the past few months cannot be weighed in the same scale as a rich businessman who has not been paying the loan installments despite a boom in business. The same laws cannot apply to both, because while for the former, not repaying the loan is because life is a struggle to fill the stomachs of the family everyday, for the latter, it is just a way to add more zeroes to the bank balance. Punishing both in the same manner would be unjust and go against the very doctrine laws follow - justice.
To further my point, I would like to illustrate another scenario. Consider a person who murdered someone in a cold-blooded, calculated manner over some petty feud. Now, consider another person who has also murdered someone, but accidently or in self defense, after the other person attacked first. Even though both of them have blood on their hands, applying the exact same laws to both the situations would result in destroying the life of the second person over something that was not even their fault.
These two examples create a strong case to solidify my claim that laws should be flexible enough to take various factors into consideration. However, taking a look at the flip side of the coin, in most situations it can become very difficult to verify and strongly establish the facts stated by the accused in order to get a clear picture of the circumstances, times and places involved. This can therefore be used by people to twist laws to their own benefit. So utmost care and scrutiny must be undertaken while making laws flexible according to the parameters of individual cases.
Finally, everything boils down to one thing - critical analysis and logical thinking of the case in all angles, taking into consideration all its different parameters before passing any judgement, so that justice prevails above all. This is only possible if laws are flexible enough to treat each case uniquely and mete out correct justice to those who seek it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 228, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Countries
... society institutions, offices, states. countries. This is precisely why I believe that j...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 63, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...work for a pair of socks, but that sure isnt the case with laws. For example, taking...
^^^^
Line 3, column 561, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...ggle to fill the stomachs of the family everyday, for the latter, it is just a way to ad...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, look, may, second, so, therefore, well, while, for example, sort of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2172.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 445.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8808988764 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59293186426 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63729830545 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 254.0 215.323595506 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570786516854 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 684.9 704.065955056 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.9348663723 60.3974514979 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.75 118.986275619 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8125 23.4991977007 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6875 5.21951772744 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172374893893 0.243740707755 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0533720693273 0.0831039109588 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0441882378942 0.0758088955206 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0922072983562 0.150359130593 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0576935578322 0.0667264976115 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 48.8420337079 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 12.1743820225 103% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 100.480337079 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.