The most effective way to understand contemporary culture is to analyze the trends of its youth.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
<span style="font-size: 19.36px;"> In our society, many cultures exist and those cultures are prone to change according to the time. It is completely agreeable that to understand the contemporary culture in a most effective way is to analyze the trends of its youth.
First of all, the young generation of any society is the flag bearer of any new changes. Any new trends are first accepted by the youth of any society. For example, when the Pop song came it was the youth who started advocating that new style of the song. But the older generation continues to criticize the Pop culture and did not consider it as an elegant form of music. So if one wants to understand the contemporary culture they must analyze the trends which the young generation is following as they are the people who influenced by the new culture and trends.
Secondly, many different kinds of people exist in our society. Everybody has their own taste and own logic to follow and to do something. To understand what is the current trends going on in a particular society if somebody observes all the people and generations of the society they will get different kind of opinion which will give negative information about the new trends. But if only the young generation is been observed mostly we will get a specific kind of pattern which they are following in their day to day life. For instance, if we want to know which dress or hairstyle is trending now, we must observe the young people what they are wearing, what kind of hairstyle most of them have. If we start observing the older generation we will find a different kind of information which does not match which we have got observing the young people. Because the older generation generally tends to follow the trends which they are accustomed to and which existed at their time. So, the young generation must be the point of observation to get a clear idea about contemporary culture.
Furthermore, one might argue that older generation is also following the current trends nowadays to survive in the society, so if somebody has to get an idea about the current trends older generation should not be neglected. But, in general, some of the people might be following the current trends but it can not be completely the new culture they are following, it will be mixed with the trends of their own generation as well. Thus, analyzing the people from the other generations rather than the youth would give a piece of inaccurate information about the contemporary culture.
To conclude, no generation should be neglected to understand a particular culture but to understand contemporary culture it is desirable to analyze the trends which the young generation is following for a better and complete understanding. </span><br>
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 12, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...e new culture and trends. Secondly, many different kinds of people exist in our society. E...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 700, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...at kind of hairstyle most of them have. If we start observing the older generation...
^^
Line 7, column 244, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ould not be neglected. But, in general, some of the people might be following the current t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, thus, well, as to, for example, for instance, in general, kind of, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2315.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 471.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91507430998 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65859790218 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87351911004 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 215.323595506 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.3991507431 0.4932671777 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 729.0 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.8633659163 60.3974514979 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.842105263 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7894736842 23.4991977007 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15789473684 5.21951772744 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178585829943 0.243740707755 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0727581910272 0.0831039109588 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0772754516317 0.0758088955206 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131682276354 0.150359130593 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0456175438393 0.0667264976115 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.21 8.38706741573 86% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 100.480337079 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.