This topic raises the controversial issue of whether the most effective way to understand contemporary culture is to analyze the trends of its youth. Indisputably, we cannot judge the present culture on the basis of trends of its youth totally. Nevertheless, trends is not the only way to understand the present culture. Thus, I generally disagree with the opinion that present culture is totally dependant on the trend of the youth, and would agrue that the most effective way to understand contemporary culture is to analyze the trends of its youth.
First of all, people love following the trend and walk with the ongoing trends. I would like to pointout that the trend is a friend. To illustrate, let us look at the example of the attire of the people and the way they talk generally changes with the culture. Both common sense and personal experience have told us that trends of the youth shows present culture. Hence, all the evidence above demonstrates that the trend is a friend.
Admittedly, trend is one of the way to judge the present culture. This is true especially when it comes to clothing, living style, jobs. In addition, the way the people talk and communication style. However, the above argument does not constitute a sufficient support to claim that trend is enough to understand the contemporary culture. Because things changes with the time so does the trend.
In conclusion, although trends of its youth cannot tell us the exact present culture, it is one of the most effective way to understand present culture.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 398, Rule ID: DEPENDENT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'dependent' on?
Suggestion: dependent
...opinion that present culture is totally dependant on the trend of the youth, and would ag...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, look, nevertheless, so, thus, in addition, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 58.6224719101 63% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1280.0 2235.4752809 57% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 260.0 442.535393258 59% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92307692308 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.55969084622 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73256712213 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 215.323595506 53% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.442307692308 0.4932671777 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 392.4 704.065955056 56% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.7039015409 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.3333333333 118.986275619 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 23.4991977007 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 5.21951772744 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240827618178 0.243740707755 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0929264013157 0.0831039109588 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0840228716602 0.0758088955206 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159138930322 0.150359130593 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0920959715318 0.0667264976115 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 14.1392134831 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.96 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.27 8.38706741573 87% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 100.480337079 46% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.