This topic raises the controversial issue of whether in future nobody will but printed newspaper or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying. Indisputably, printed newspaper are eventually used till today even after having so many online mobile applications for news and books. Nevertheless, people still pay for printed newspaper instead they can freely read the same news online. Thus, I generally disagree with the opinion that in future nobody will buy printed newspapers and books and would argue that they will be able to read everything they want online without paying.
First of all, things used in their vintage way are better and cannot be replaced directly. I would like to point out that things used in original way have the own uniqueness. Also, prolong exposure to digital screen causes eye irritation and other eyes problem. To illustrate, let us look at the example of children getting specs at younger age due to watching online on digital screens like Mobile Phones,TV and Computer. Consequently, results in paying for medicals and harming your body. Furthermore, using technology in required manner does no harm. People nowadays buys goods like clothes, daily consumable food items online and get delivered at their door step instead of going out and buying it in legit way which has made them lazy and indirectly causing health problem and eventually leads to paying medical bills. Nevertheless, people are still doing it knowingly. Also some people who understand difference of online and legit ways still prefer legit over online where required. Both common sense and personal experience have told us that using technology to some extend is always beneficial.
Admittedly, paying for required things cannot be neglected. This is true when it comes to paying for a computer which finishes work in short amount of time. As your know "Time is Money" your save time you are saving money. However, the above argument does not constitute a sufficient support to claim that in future nobody will buy printed newspaper or books because they will able to read everything they want online without paying. Because some people prefer health over money and also love enjoying vintage way of reading printed newspapers and books.
In conclusion, although some people prefer reading newspaper and books online not everyone in future will replace printed newspaper and books due to some of its benefits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 248, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'eyes'' or 'eye's'?
Suggestion: eyes'; eye's
... screen causes eye irritation and other eyes problem. To illustrate, let us look at ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 405, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , TV
...ne on digital screens like Mobile Phones,TV and Computer. Consequently, results in ...
^^^
Line 2, column 875, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...s, people are still doing it knowingly. Also some people who understand difference o...
^^^^
Line 2, column 1075, Rule ID: SOME_EXTEND[1]
Message: Did you mean 'extent' ("extent" is a noun, "extend" is a verb)?
Suggestion: extent
...e told us that using technology to some extend is always beneficial. Admittedly, payi...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, still, thus, in conclusion, in short, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2067.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 398.0 315.596192385 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19346733668 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53435399619 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537688442211 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 643.5 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.0915711817 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.35 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.461839100028 0.244688304435 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131298488688 0.084324248473 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.192666552392 0.0667982634062 288% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.313168168171 0.151304729494 207% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.198497936377 0.056905535591 349% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.