Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
This topic raises the controversial issue of whether the government should be focusing on solving the current ongoing problems of today rather than on trying to solve the upcoming problems of the future. The prompt recommends solving today's problems is more necessary than solving the problem of the future. In my opinion, I moderately agree with this suggestion and argue that solving problems of today while taking into account the problem of the future will not only solve today's problem but will also give an upper hand for the future's problem. The following are the ways to consider for solving the problems of the present and future as well.
First of all, I would like to point out that problems also have their types like high priority problems and low priority problems. To illustrate, let us consider an example of the government facing pandemic problems which is of high priority and also economic problem a low case scenario. But, both need to be solved at different levels and based on its urgency. Solving problems based on their priority is the need of the present. In such a case, the government has to solve the problem of the pandemic ignoring the rest problems faced by the country at the present which supports the main issue concern.
Now let us consider another scenario in which the problem of the present can be solved taking into consideration the future problem. To illustrate, let us consider an example of the government facing a problem of rising population and another problem of deforestation. In this case, the problems are interlinked and can be solved taking into consideration both the problems simultaneously. The present problem faced by the government is the rising population of the country which may lead to cutting down of more and more trees in the future which will lead to deforestation. Consequently, solving the problem of the present will automatically affect the outcome of the future. In this case solving the present problem will lead to solving the problem of the future automatically. In this example, the main issue is refuted.
Considering both the above examples we can say that the above issue statement does not have sufficient support to claim that the government should only be focusing on present problems and should not anticipate the future one's.\
In conclusion, albeit the statement is somewhat true in some sense but it has some flaws which need to be corrected. In fact, we can reframe the sentence as the government should solve the high priority problems first also taking into consideration the future ones.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
This topic raises the controversial issu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 547, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'futures'' or 'future's'?
Suggestion: futures'; future's
...ut will also give an upper hand for the futures problem. The following are the ways to ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ems of the present and future as well. First of all, I would like to point out ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...which supports the main issue concern. Now let us consider another scenario in ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s example, the main issue is refuted. Considering both the above examples we c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hould not anticipate the future ones.\ In conclusion, albeit the statement is s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, may, so, well, while, as to, in conclusion, in fact, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2152.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 431.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99303944316 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55637350225 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71226820457 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 215.323595506 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.371229698376 0.4932671777 75% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 669.6 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.1130208077 60.3974514979 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.555555556 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9444444444 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44444444444 5.21951772744 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 5.13820224719 272% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.404269202765 0.243740707755 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.171600412525 0.0831039109588 206% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0861960546885 0.0758088955206 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.244558132193 0.150359130593 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101940443871 0.0667264976115 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.2 8.38706741573 86% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 100.480337079 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.