A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Some people believe that a nation should require all of its pupils to study the same national curriculum before college, while others don’t. In my opinion, a government should not require all of students to participate the same syllabus, rather encourage them to do so for two reasons.
First, the wherewithal has always been a crucial consideration, especially in the rural area, because resource is inadequate to follow the same courses suggested by the government. For example, Tai-Tung, a faraway county of Taiwan, most elementary or junior high schools have less than one hundred people and no more than ten teachers. Apparently, the above instance demonstrates that there are not enough faculties to carry out the same syllabus as those of big cities abundant in faculties. If a government is going to execute the policy, then it must pay the additional equipment and recruit more teachers. Therefore, it has a negative impact on finance of a nation with limited benefit since it only benefit minority, not major part of students.
Secondly, not every student is apt to take the same syllabus. Some students already find their talents or interest, so the irrelevant curriculum distracts them from their major. For instance, the most famous and the best woman chess player, Hen-Jaja had aborted her academy after junior-high school. Because she already found her life goal and target as a professional chess player, she decided to devote herself into chess after then. She had won a lot of championship in the world-class competition. She had earned 30 thousand dollars from bonus when she was only seventeen years old. If Hen-Jaja had been forced to take the courses following the national guide, then she would not be successful in playing chess. Thus, the universal syllabus is not the best way to nourish its young people.
Finally, the naysayers may argue that the breadth of knowledge is more imperative than the depth of it before college because it helps pupils to investigate their interests. Of course, such exploration is essential because it motivates and intrigues them to study further. If they are impassioned in studying something, then the success rate is likely to increase. If they succeed and make contributions to the society, then a nation will benefit from it. Moreover, most adolescents do not find their interest before college. Therefore, the best way to compromise between those who has already set up their mind and those who don’t is encouraging them to participate the recommended syllabus instead of forcing them. Despite barren schools are unable to offer the counterpart material, they could collaborate and share wherewithal with others.
In conclusion, the recommended curriculum is the better policy for the government to carry out, it not only offers opportunities of interest investigation for young people, but also has feasibility for little schools and flexibility for talented pupils.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, finally, first, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, of course, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2470.0 2235.4752809 110% => OK
No of words: 473.0 442.535393258 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22198731501 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66353547975 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83638368115 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 264.0 215.323595506 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558139534884 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 779.4 704.065955056 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2210700845 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.391304348 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5652173913 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.65217391304 5.21951772744 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232102844244 0.243740707755 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0626222939487 0.0831039109588 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0969461819175 0.0758088955206 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142582674865 0.150359130593 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.150577223478 0.0667264976115 226% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 100.480337079 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.