Education is one of the most important tool for national growth and development. Designing curriculum plays a vital role, this should be well thought out. The stated issue will not be feasible and beneficial for the students as same national curriculum for everyone comes with some greater disadvantages.
Firstly, not only students but human beings has different attributes and needs. There is no size that fits it all. Some students are good at math where some may be excellent sportsmen. Some are really prodigious artists where others are drawn to science. If same curriculum is forced upon both groups of students, then atleast one, most possibly both groups will suffer as a result. The curriculum should be designed based on the students need and preference and different students have different needs. If we take different students species and try to enforce same curriculam and judge them then we are not only being just but also ruining their future. The example of taking fish and monkey and judging them by their ability to climb tree is very relevent here.
Furthermore, some students are special child with different ability. The 'single curriculum for everyone' approach will subvert them from getting a proper education. There needs must be assessed properly and a considering approach must be taken while designing curriculum
Then comes another question of innovation and development. Till now, no curriculum has been identified as the panacea of educating students. So, there is a great need for innovation and development regarding education policy, curriculum design and overall schooling system. If we follow the stated policy then the innovation in the education sector will be next to impossible. As different types of school follow different curriculum and strategy, we can compare what works best and what should be the benchmark. But single curriculum for everyone will deprive us of the opportunity to innovate.
Some people might argue that 'Sam national curriculum for all' will encourage equal opportunity for all socio economic class of students as a same national curriculum will mean that the rich will not use a different curriculum. But this stand possesses a far greater risk of not providing proper education to the students and ultimately jeopardize the future of the nation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 431, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...riculum should be designed based on the students need and preference and different stude...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 526, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...e different needs. If we take different students species and try to enforce same curricu...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 275, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...um design and overall schooling system. If we follow the stated policy then the in...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'firstly', 'furthermore', 'if', 'may', 'really', 'regarding', 'so', 'then', 'well', 'while', 'as a result']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.224438902743 0.240241500013 93% => OK
Verbs: 0.16957605985 0.157235817809 108% => OK
Adjectives: 0.112219451372 0.0880659088768 127% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0623441396509 0.0497285424764 125% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0274314214464 0.0444667217837 62% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0972568578554 0.12292977631 79% => OK
Participles: 0.0498753117207 0.0406280797675 123% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.7399979164 2.79330140395 98% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0149625935162 0.030933414821 48% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.00249376558603 0.0016655270985 150% => OK
Determiners: 0.102244389027 0.0997080785238 103% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0399002493766 0.0249443105267 160% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00997506234414 0.0148568991511 67% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2318.0 2732.02544248 85% => OK
No of words: 371.0 452.878318584 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.24797843666 6.0361032391 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.58838876751 96% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.388140161725 0.366273622748 106% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.309973045822 0.280924506359 110% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.245283018868 0.200843997647 122% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.167115902965 0.132149295362 126% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7399979164 2.79330140395 98% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 219.290929204 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522911051213 0.48968727796 107% => OK
Word variations: 56.8927694207 55.4138127331 103% => OK
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6194690265 102% => OK
Sentence length: 17.6666666667 23.380412469 76% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7495474774 59.4972553346 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.380952381 141.124799967 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 23.380412469 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.666666666667 0.674092028746 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.21349557522 58% => OK
Readability: 48.6639712489 51.4728631049 95% => OK
Elegance: 1.43269230769 1.64882698954 87% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279610032037 0.391690518653 71% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0847691803456 0.123202303941 69% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0810485460152 0.077325440228 105% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.457149483067 0.547984918172 83% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.142360997889 0.149214159877 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100897044643 0.161403998019 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0601519778097 0.0892212321368 67% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.283557818042 0.385218514788 74% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0570097590137 0.0692045440612 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192342329936 0.275328986314 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.07392296223 0.0653680567796 113% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.4325221239 125% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.30420353982 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88274336283 82% => OK
Positive topic words: 13.0 7.22455752212 180% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.66592920354 82% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.70907079646 111% => OK
Total topic words: 19.0 13.5995575221 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.