The prompt argue that in order to preserve any resources in natural states, nation should pass the law to preserve it. I agree with the prompt that government should pass the law regarding the protection of natural resources.
With the increase in World’s population, the utilization of natural resources is soaring, which lead to endangerment of certain species. Because remaining natural resources can be preserved by passing the law, various nations are implementing policy and law to preserve it. For instance, due to high degree of deforestation in Terai belt of Nepal, the wildlife such as Royal Bengal tiger, one horned rhino (found on in Nepal) was limited 15 years ago. So to save such species, government proscribed anyone but incumbent personnel entering the forest. In this period of time, there was rapid increase in wild animals. In 2015, the government of Nepal had gifted one horned rhino to the neighboring countries such as China and India.
Also, to let high degree for preservation, laws plays vital role. There may be many local protection programs which may lead to minor alleviation of problem. However, implementation of law from national level makes citizen mandatory to protect the wilderness or give up their participation which can lead deterioration of forest. For example, In Chitwan national parks, there was many smuggling of woods, bones of elephant and rhino despite many protection program at local level. However, promulgation of law from the nation regarding protection of natural resources lowers such activity at the minimum level. After the promulgation of law, forest and wildlife are prospering at higher rate.
However, in Brazil or Kenya, where there is large jungle, implementing such law may have deleterious effect on indigent population. These countries have large forest or natural resources and having a continuous monitoring over the area is onerous and costly. Implementation of such law may be infeasible to such countries, whereas, the country like Nepal, where the natural resources are limited, such laws are inevitable for protection of wilderness.
In conclusion, national law is very important to protect any wildness in those areas where natural resources are limited as such law prevents annihilation of forest trees and animals. Therefore, I believe that national laws associated to protection of wildness should be promulgated to those countries which have scare natural resources.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 563, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... personnel entering the forest. In this period of time, there was rapid increase in wild anima...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 210, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'makes'' or 'make's'?
Suggestion: makes'; make's
...plementation of law from national level makes citizen mandatory to protect the wilder...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 314, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'scared'.
Suggestion: scared
...omulgated to those countries which have scare natural resources.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, regarding, so, therefore, whereas, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 33.0505617978 36% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 12.9106741573 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2078.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 384.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41145833333 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91858196043 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497395833333 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 651.6 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.740449438202 270% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.7984704006 60.3974514979 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.368421053 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2105263158 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94736842105 5.21951772744 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222838790989 0.243740707755 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0774458158549 0.0831039109588 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0634175650631 0.0758088955206 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143127188294 0.150359130593 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0345555742583 0.0667264976115 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 100.480337079 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.