Nature should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even it these areas could be developed for natural gain.
Many countries are exploiting natural resources for the purpose of making economic gains. This on the other hand is destroying the natural habitat of many wild animals causing many to be extinct or in the verge of extinction. Thus, nations must prefer wilderness areas and natural resources ahead of economic gains.
The natural resources and wild life resources is reason we live our life or are able to evolve as intellectual beings. This is the place where our ancestors lived, hunted, and sustained their life through meager resources. Similar to our hometown these places have emotion attachments. When someone moves from their hometown, to earn money and be successful, many of us after being established have a natural tendency to support their home town and contribute for its wellbeing. Many people even get emotional when they return to their home after a long period of time. In war times many people wrote letters that showed a lot of love for their hometown or their country. Destroying these resources is like destroying our own hometown. Thus, instead of destroying these wildlife areas for economic benefits, we should instead spend resources to preserve these natural resources.
Using the wilderness areas for economic profits will cause extinction of lot of wild animals. These animals need certain amount of area to sustain their life. If we start encroaching these places, they might be forced to leave their natural territory. Bound to leave their home, they can put their life at risk and even die. Thus, encroaching the wilderness area, for personal gains, in a large scale might cause decimation of these wild animals. Many animals like mountain lion and tigers are already in the verge of extinction because people are using wildlife areas for economic gains. The only way to protect these animals is by the involvement of the government by not allowing any kind of economic activities in these wild life areas. Making laws to stop these activities, especially economic activities, will preserve wild life and helps thrive populations of wild animals.
However, there can be many areas in certain country’s that might contain valuable elements like gold, silver, iron which can be a backbone to the country’s economy. If the country is poor and many people live under the poverty line, then these natural resources can help the people improve their life style. In such condition, the government must make sure that the wild life living in those places are not affected: if required they should explore new natural habitat for these animals.
Thus, protecting natural resources and wildlife areas is the only way we can help mother nature and give back for the life she has given us.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-17 | Bishal Bhandari | 50 | view |
- Technology, while apparently aimed to simplify our lives, only makes our lives more complicated. 50
- Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today. 50
- Nature should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even it these areas could be developed for natural gain. 50
- A recent study rating 100 college football players showed a strong relationship between their number of colds caught per year and their team s records Of the players studied those who had the fewest colds had teams with the win loss ratios that were on av 60
- It is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts that it is for them to learn facts. Agree or disagree? 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 554, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... they return to their home after a long period of time. In war times many people wrote letters...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, then, thus, well, as for, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 45.0 33.0505617978 136% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2278.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 447.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09619686801 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59808378696 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53854569086 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.467561521253 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 724.5 704.065955056 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.1711415189 60.3974514979 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0434782609 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4347826087 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.21739130435 5.21951772744 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 10.2758426966 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346237957697 0.243740707755 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114159915658 0.0831039109588 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.063154001293 0.0758088955206 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223820936212 0.150359130593 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.023043341571 0.0667264976115 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 100.480337079 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.