In this era of rapid technological development, it is very important to possess knowledge in every other field of study and this is also helpful in walking hand -in-hand with the rising competition.Individuals are now evaluated based on the level of knowledge they have in their field of study as well in other areas of study.The statement made above is partially in sync with the points mentioned by me. The statement however does not hold true from the perspective of experience. Hence I partially agree with the statement.
I concede to the fact that for any study to be complete, one must possess knowledge from outside that field. One such example would be the core subjects that we study in our universities. For example, subjects like Mathematics, Physics and Electronics, are symbiotic. Each subject requires knowledge of the other to excel in the subject. In order to excel in Electronics, we need to have sufficient knowledge of Physics to understand various laws and knowledge of Mathematics to perform calculations. Hence, failure to understand one subject affects the knowledge of the other subject automatically.
Now considering the experience point of view, well its not a mandate to be experienced in another field of study. Mere knowledge of the subjects outside a field would serve the purpose. For example, a fitness trainer possesses knowledge about various medical related problems and the cure for those. The profession is such that, without having knowledge about the various body mechanisms, reaction to various kinds of exercises, how to treat a person when he experiences cramps, all these are of utmost importance and would help a trainer to be complete. But this does not necessitate the fact that he must possess experience as a doctor to treat all the medical problems. Mere knowledge about the field of medical will help him in guiding the people. His knowledge as a fitness trainer is what comes into consideration when people enroll to the fitness club.
Another example is of a physician and a specialist. A physician possesses knowledge of every other field of medicine but in bits and pieces. This knowledge is sufficient to treat a patient in the initial level. When the problem does not alleviate, he suggests the patients to visit a specialist. In order to guide the patients in the initial stages, the physician need not have an experience in the respective fields.
Thus, it is true that having knowledge from outside a particular field of study definitely helps in shaping a better future and expands the ken and makes you more cognizant. But at the same time, it is not mandatory to have an experience in other areas of study.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 199, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Individuals
...nd -in-hand with the rising competition.Individuals are now evaluated based on the level of...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 327, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...f study as well in other areas of study.The statement made above is partially in sy...
^^^
Line 1, column 483, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...rue from the perspective of experience. Hence I partially agree with the statement. ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 52, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...ring the experience point of view, well its not a mandate to be experienced in anot...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, so, thus, well, for example, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 80.0 58.6224719101 136% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2237.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 446.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01569506726 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5955099915 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97026307725 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 215.323595506 93% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.448430493274 0.4932671777 91% => OK
syllable_count: 710.1 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.740449438202 270% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.8393486608 60.3974514979 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.2608695652 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3913043478 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.86956521739 5.21951772744 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262396997303 0.243740707755 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0761701787368 0.0831039109588 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.071867765856 0.0758088955206 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152622619019 0.150359130593 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0370573758855 0.0667264976115 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 14.1392134831 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 100.480337079 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.